mentando
From what I understood, you are saying that the old way of doing it was better, but I cannot help but feel, that some things are better on a larger scale.
For me the problem with modern recycling is more the frequency and the percentage that is actually recycled, not the scale it is done at. Maybe the scale contributes to the percentage problem, but I cannot imagine the frequency being caused by it.
The frequency to me seems to be caused by the marketing and the general mindset to always have the newest, shiniest toys, or to stay on clothing: fashion trends.
To your first point, I agree that some people seem to be dismissing an entire comment based on one small remark. Do you think the system being a feudal one contributes to the way recycling and consumption was done? To me it has more to do with the poverty and making due, what you have. This cycles back to reusing things you already used beyond their lifespan. I cannot imagine an interaction that is born solely of the governmental system, but please share your viewpoint.
Also: I don't think your viewpoint is too extreme. We should learn from our history and maybe we could even derive ways to move forward.
It is essentially a really light Linux Distribution with Chrome running on top of it. But I have no clue, how hard or easy it would be for Google to allow a package manager or something to work.
As I said, they do not actively block you from installing crouton, which allows you to use any browser, but I don't know, if that would help with an antitrust lawsuit.
I mean I have a Chromebook and I can install crouton and run Firefox.
Or would Google have to provide a "supported" way to install other browsers?
For some it is obviously not, but for others it is a good default.
What's bad is that it cannot be changed. That is not debatable.
Because that would decrease the redundancy, right? With Falcon-9 you would lose 2/9 of thrust if you turn off the mirrored engine in the best case. In a Falcon-3 scenario, you would lose at least 1/3 for middle engine failure or 2/3 for a side engine failure.
I check the weather with one touch on the home screen.
I don't need to navigate to work, because the trip is short enough and there won't be any heavy traffic.
The alarm is set to 6.30 anyways, I don't have to change it daily, so I just left the standard weekday setting.
Not hating on your use case, but I am always around people and I think I would get several odd glances, when talking to my phone like that.
I don't know, since I do not use one, but at least for Spotify it is possible (as tested by my brother).
What it says about the developer though, is that he didn't bother reading up on, what is the highest value, but just chose a rather high value of 99999.
Or does it increase the possible damage, but the security is high enough that the expected damage is lower than storing it elsewhere?