mcbishop
mcbishop on Hacker News
Snark snark. I meant when walking around my house, initiating "smart home" stuff.
I've thought about learning sign language in order to communicate with the computer in a not-super-annoying way. Your solution... much more realistic. Cheers.
FYI: The one tool page I checked out included a real life artifact.
Communicate with chrome via the claude extension.
With the desktop app (for windows). I gave it the link and asked it to fill it out (in the external chrome browser). I reviewed / edited what it wrote and submitted. Very simple.
Claude Code filled in the form for me.
This is an awesomely clear and methodical explanation of system failure.
> At Anthropic, our jobs have moved from reading every diff to the decisions machines are bad at:
> ...Architecture that sets a pattern others will copy...
I'm happy that even Anthropic agrees this is best left to humans.
Super thoughtful discussion here. 100% human generated it seems.
I love the UX-design book: Don't Make Me Think.
I'm happy to now know about perma computing.
> up to the level of the mid 90s
So pair this with back-to-basics tech (e.g. text files)... that can serve us extremely well.
Yup. The closer I am to her friends... the stronger the compulsion. It's like magnetism.
As a dad, I have a strong compulsion to tell (bad) dad jokes. Ideally puns. All the time. I didn't used to be this way.
> As a rule, the highest-paid workers at Mondragon cooperatives earn only six times more than the lowest-paid workers.
And I bet these salary-capped co-op leaders are still appropriately capable / qualified. The U.S. billionare situation is ugly.
But there is some valid concern around internet-connected PV / battery power electronics getting bricked remotely.
All good, I appreciate what you built! On desktop with Windows 11. I just tried it again and it was much easier to see the info (thru hover) than before.
Thanks, it's much easier to load info with the option you shared.
This is awesome. It'd be even more awesome if it was easier to show a power plant's info upon hover / click. ...It's currently too much of a cat-and-mouse game for me.
I've heard the EV charging has played a big role in the maturation of GaN / SiC.
A distinction was made:
> the transfer switch variety switches your house between the inverter and the grid whereas the disconnect just physically disconnects the inverters output
Thanks, and I agree that a DIY-inverter designer should be able to meet grid-interconnection requirements (e.g. IEEE 1547-2018). With that said, I think case-by-base evaluation from the AHJ would be prudent without a UL listing... something that AHJs don't want to do.
I'd prefer to just put the DIY inverter behind a transfer switch (with an adequate battery bank and maybe a small propane generator)... with the grid as emergency fallback.
> Why the fearmongering?
The main concern is exporting to a downed grid that line-workers are trying to restore.
Not that this is accepted by insurers or AHJs ("authorities having jurisdiction"), but one can use UL-certified components in an (open-source) _assembly_ that itself isn't UL certified. This at least supports the argument that the overall product is safe if thoughtfully designed and assembled. An example is the OpenEVSE level-2 car charger (which I had a really good experience with).
The creator of OpenClaw, for example, has come to appreciate grammatical / spelling errors in human writing (as he said in a recent Lex Fridman interview).
Loosely related: This Lex Fridman discussion with a nuclear-fusion engineer, about 1-million-amp 100-million-degree electrical systems... blew my mind:
https://lexfridman.com/david-kirtley
For me, there's a sharp binary:
If I ask AI to "own" a coding-problem solution — with me passing back the failure responses until resolved — my mind gets numb and I learn nothing.
If I insist on owning the solution — using AI in my effort to better understand the problem space — my mind is active and I get better at coding.
Sometimes I'm lazy and fall into the former. But mostly, so far, the latter.
> This is just a grift.
I'd like to understand why. Just too much complexity? Gravity storage is compelling to this layman.