mborsuk

From what I can tell (just started using uv) it doesn't break the original workflow with the venv, just adds the uv run option as well.

but then people know when your diving, if you carry all the time they won't know

How to Program by Coincidence https://pragprog.com/the-pragmatic-programmer/extracts/coinc...

Suppose Fred is given a programming assignment. Fred types in some code, tries it, and it seems to work. Fred types in some more code, tries it, and it still seems to work. After several weeks of coding this way, the program suddenly stops working, and after hours of trying to fix it, he still doesn’t know why. Fred may well spend a significant amount of time chasing this piece of code around without ever being able to fix it. No matter what he does, it just doesn’t ever seem to work right.

Fred doesn’t know why the code is failing because he didn’t know why it worked in the first place. It seemed to work, given the limited “testing” that Fred did, but that was just a coincidence. Buoyed by false confidence, Fred charged ahead into oblivion. Now, most intelligent people may know someone like Fred, but we know better. We don’t rely on coincidences—do we?

Sometimes we might. Sometimes it can be pretty easy to confuse a happy coincidence with a purposeful plan

Are you on OS X? he says it's only expected to work on linux...

Ok so this allows them to unlock the car, maybe start it, though the article doesn't really get into that, but then what? After they drive beyond the range of the amplified key transceiver?

Every time I read this I am reminded of units(1) util, which is super useful and I always forget about and revert to Google. But yeah, that connect timeout to 500 mi correlation is fun too.

> In order to connect to known networks which don’t broadcast their presence, almost all your wifi-enabled devices: laptops, tablets, phones, etc. will try to probe for networks they know about

But aren't nearly all APs configured to broadcast SSID? So why is that probing necessary in general?

How quickly did you read this? He says very nearly what you are saying:

"Well, I want to be a little careful here. I think it’s important to distinguish two areas where the word neural is currently being used.

One of them is in deep learning. And there, each “neuron” is really a cartoon. It’s a linear-weighted sum that’s passed through a nonlinearity. Anyone in electrical engineering would recognize those kinds of nonlinear systems. Calling that a neuron is clearly, at best, a shorthand. It’s really a cartoon. There is a procedure called logistic regression in statistics that dates from the 1950s, which had nothing to do with neurons but which is exactly the same little piece of architecture."

I'll just paste the same thing here that I wrote in response to commenters on FB misunderstanding the problem:

"Even though I disagree with most of your comments (to the extent that it is any more than unrelated editorializing) and everyone talking about "too many methods" etc, the actual bug that was triggered is here and provides a test case: https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=22586 showing that multiple interface inheritance triggers this easily."

Issue 22586 - android - Dexopt fails with "LinearAlloc exceeded" for deep interface hierarchies

https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=22586

They do to a large degree yes. The Google maps add-on SDK for instance isn't available on devices that haven't been blessed by google (and received an official Vending.apk).