mbmbn
Jesus Christ. You people, smelling your own farts. It’s just ridiculous.
A bunch of nobodies, pending they are some sort of intellectual powerhouse, reining down on a guy that revolutionized, electric vehicles, space communications and space travel, like THEY are actually his mental superiors.
If you don’t want to work, but you are somehow able to get by without having your existence assured by redistributing the property of someone else, more power to you.
It was a rabbit hole and in the end I got back using my NVIDIA Shield. This is about 10 years now, but it’s actually still the best option.
This kind of discourse is so intellectually poor…
And please stop that rape red herring. The overwhelming majority of abortions are carried out as contraceptive methods.
I believe there’s something very wrong with your moral compass, pal.
Chinese models are not innovating anything, they are just doing what China does everywhere else: copying the West… poorly but cheaper.
And before the Chinese astroturfing starts (it already started, that’s clear from the comments and voting): the point is not even that the US companies have the right to intelectual property over their models (they should, but ok, that’s not even the point). The point is that China is incapable of innovation and any innovation into AI we can expect, will always come from the US.
This is an article about initiatives to attract scientists to the Netherlands, not about some supposed ongoing brain drain.
Jesus Christ.
Ideology is truly blinding.
At least here, it already happened, to have the PM resigning and then someone else from the party to pick up the role and that’s legally sound.
So, it seems clear this film does have a side to pick and will be of dubious accuracy.
“Neel did give some thought to including Donald Trump in his film – even though, “to be clear, he is not a dictator,” he says. “He wants to be one, but he’s not. I did find a chef who cooked for him before he got elected.”
It’s just people used to virtue signaling that aren’t willing to pay any price, no matter how small, for what they defend. They really think they are up to something when all they do is speak and “look good”.
If they think their company is doing something really problematic, then resign.
The same people crying that “Trump is a fascist” go on in tangents on how Jews control the world and vote for candidates with actual Nazi tattoos.
It would be just the usual Silly Season if it wasn’t so serious to be this detached from actual reality.
I know, I know. The community keeps pretending this isn’t an issue for the last, hum, 15 years? But it is, and for people that are looking for a tool and not for a statement, it quickly drives them away from Firefox back to Chrome browsers.
Sure, it does last a lot more when asking simple questions about the repo and doing simple surgical fixes. But as soon as I start doing bigger tasks that need plans written, it just exhausts the limits too fast (and unlike codex, if it’s in a middle of a task, Claude actually stops, while codex, even after hitting the limits, finishes the present task).
Codex is better, but still, getting worst in this regard.
So, I’m not that thrilled with this new model unless it means they are increasing opus token limits to what sonnet is at the present, and this new model gets the limits opus are at now.
BTW: the only skills I have in use are Obra Superpowers. I’ve been thinking if that’s at the origin of high token usage, but I doubt it.
They weren’t distributing a scientific article.
Link: https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/49/6/901/164764/Mi...
“These proposed cuts would eliminate the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, which they claim “is replete with DEI [diversity, equity, and inclusion] expenditures,” the Fogarty International Center, which is responsible for funding degree programs in foreign countries that benefit the health of all, including Americans, and the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, whose charge includes supporting research and offering information about complementary health approaches in the setting of whole-person health.”
This is ideological. It’s got nothing to do with medical science and research.