mbac32768
> This technically also means we have to trust the hardware, OS, OCaml compiler that the Rocq proof checker relies on.
It just so happens Claude and I recently did an independent implementation of OCaml and ruled out malware in the compiler bootstrap via DDC (and also by achieving byte identical outputs).
https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/ocaml-compiler-implemented-in-c-...
So, we can at least rule out "trusting trust" malware in the OCaml part of the stack and up. (Rocq does not have trusting trust concerns since it's implemented in OCaml and C)
I bet that takes a week at most.
The problem is they're just running a very dumb, cheap model on the results because running a smart model on every search result page would cost them infinity money.
All of the years we've spent on immutable by default, strong types and dreaming about the lambda has to matter! The AI that just rips out thousands of lines an hour of imperative and weakly typed code just has to be leading organizations to ruin! You'll see!
We worked hard at honing our craft. It's still meaningful, damnit!
Maybe Rust let's you encapsulate the unsafe a little better than C++ but the wins are going to be surprisingly small. If you had to build it today you'd maybe use Rust but the case for rewriting an existing C based runtime in Rust is not that strong.
Also for things like interpreter loops the absence of computed goto in Rust stable is a real performance killer. Explicit tail calls (the `become` keyword in nightly) work but maybe you don't want your big rewrite to rely on that.
For the longest time whenever I'd meet someone at a party I would ask "so, what do you spend your time on?" because I specifically didn't want to box them into asking how they make money. I wanted to hear about their passions or hobbies or even the mundane tasks.
Instead, pretty much everyone told me about their jobs.
There's no reason to read the code anymore.
The LLMs produce it inhumanly fast.
They can usually debug and fix problems faster than Haskell can compile the project.
Meanwhile the open source communities are in basic denial about AI, so trying to change things by making compilation faster or advancing a Haskell interpreter are going to meet with fierce resistance.
Whatever. Give up. Just ship Python.
I sympathize.
There's alpha gal (red meat allergy ) and also ascending paralysis. And more.
I would gladly kill every tick on Earth and whatever relies on eating them so no human has to lose a kid to this again.
You can do additional device management to lock down the rest of the machine. You can force Chrome and restrict Safari/Firefox/etc on Mac just fine. Same for Windows.
> In addition to the encrypted messaging group chats, Song, Arnold, Morris, and others met in person on July 3 at a "gear check" at Morris and Arnold's residence. There, Arnold asked Song whether they would be bringing guns to the July 4 action. Song replied that they would because he would not be going to jail. Song repeated words to this effect multiple times throughout the evening, putting everyone there on notice of his intent to shoot at police rather than be arrested.
Some of these people had to know they were entering an armed conflict. The fact that their leader went on to shoot a cop looks real bad for the rest of them tagging along.
Even better if you can charge a mildly high license fee for 20 years first and then jack it up to something outrageous and still have customers who just can't drop you.
Blue Zones absolutely destroyed.
You could possibly invent these things as a Turing machinist but it'd be by stumbling backwards into them and likely doing a shitty job.
e.g. pretty good for config files or basic serialization
midwit meme template
guy on left: katie u want meet 3pm discuss project
midwit: Hi Katie, I hope this message finds you well and that your week has been off to a productive start. I wanted to reach out and proactively touch base regarding an opportunity to align on some of the ongoing project-related workstream...
guy on right: katie u want meet 3pm discuss project
Being able to minimize boilerplate and have strong refactoring and bug resistant types is a huge edge.
The only problem is their ecosystems are limited so you might spend more time than you like implementing an API or binding a system library.
These commitments were commitments by the administration in the White House at that time. They were not accords or treaties ratified by Congress. Agree with them or don't, they should have been understood as what they were: limited in legitimacy and free to be canceled by the next administration with no discussion.
This isn't a matter of arcane political skullduggery, it's spelled out in the US Constitution's definition of treaty, Article II, Section 2, Clause 2. The people were not formally heard.