matthew-hale

I tried to change the font by backspacing whatever the default was in the font family box in settings, but once I deleted the last character, the program crashed and would not open again.

Running with a trace gets:

    thread 'main' panicked at 'assertion failed: `(left == right)`
      left: `23`,
     right: `0`', /home/runner/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/font-kit-0.10.1/src/loaders/freetype.rs:817:13
    stack backtrace:
       0: rust_begin_unwind
                 at /rustc/9d1b2106e23b1abd32fce1f17267604a5102f57a/library/std/src/panicking.rs:498:5
       1: core::panicking::panic_fmt
                 at /rustc/9d1b2106e23b1abd32fce1f17267604a5102f57a/library/core/src/panicking.rs:116:14
       2: core::panicking::assert_failed_inner
       3: core::panicking::assert_failed
       4: font_kit::loaders::freetype::Font::rasterize_glyph
       5: piet_wgpu::pipeline::Cache::get_glyph_pos
       6: piet_wgpu::text::WgpuText::get_glyph_pos
       7: piet_wgpu::text::WgpuTextLayout::rebuild
       8: <piet_wgpu::text::WgpuTextLayoutBuilder as piet::text::TextLayoutBuilder>::build
       9: lapce_core::config::Config::editor_text_width
      10: <lapce_core::terminal::LapceTerminal as druid::widget::widget::Widget<lapce_core::data::LapceTabData>>::layout
      11: druid::core::WidgetPod<T,W>::layout
      12: <lapce_core::scroll::LapcePadding<T,W> as druid::widget::widget::Widget<T>>::layout
      13: druid::core::WidgetPod<T,W>::layout
      14: <lapce_core::terminal::LapceTerminalView as druid::widget::widget::Widget<lapce_core::data::LapceTabData>>::layout
      15: druid::core::WidgetPod<T,W>::layout
      16: <lapce_core::split::LapceSplitNew as druid::widget::widget::Widget<lapce_core::data::LapceTabData>>::layout
      17: druid::core::WidgetPod<T,W>::layout
      18: <lapce_core::terminal::TerminalPanel as druid::widget::widget::Widget<lapce_core::data::LapceTabData>>::layout
      19: druid::core::WidgetPod<T,W>::layout
      20: <lapce_core::tab::LapceTabNew as druid::widget::widget::Widget<lapce_core::data::LapceTabData>>::layout
      21: <druid::widget::lens_wrap::LensWrap<T,U,L,W> as druid::widget::widget::Widget<T>>::layout
      22: druid::core::WidgetPod<T,W>::layout
      23: <lapce_core::window::LapceWindowNew as druid::widget::widget::Widget<lapce_core::data::LapceWindowData>>::layout
      24: <druid::widget::lens_wrap::LensWrap<T,U,L,W> as druid::widget::widget::Widget<T>>::layout
      25: druid::core::WidgetPod<T,W>::layout
      26: druid::window::Window<T>::layout
      27: druid::window::Window<T>::do_paint
      28: druid::win_handler::AppState<T>::paint_winit_window
      29: druid::app::AppLauncher<T>::launch::{{closure}}
      30: winit::platform_impl::platform::x11::EventLoop<T>::run_return::single_iteration
      31: winit::platform_impl::platform::x11::EventLoop<T>::run
      32: winit::platform_impl::platform::EventLoop<T>::run
      33: winit::event_loop::EventLoop<T>::run
      34: lapce_core::app::lanuch
    note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace.

Agree with other comments here that it's a bit too unusable at the moment, and unfortunately I wasn't even 30 seconds into my demo before this happened, so I can't really comment on the rest of the application.

You could've read the very next sentence, which makes the point the first sentence set up:

> Assets must be accounted for when calculating wealth, so the tax service will be required to track and value assets including vehicles, homes, and material good etc. for every citizen to see if the wealth tax would apply to them -- if we didn't report material goods, the wealthy could sock money away in expensive cars, artworks, jewelry and other material non-real-estate assets as they already do for investment.

khawkins said (emphasis mine):

> by introducing a highly charged political wedge issue that offers no solutions to the problem at hand

which seems to be their core issue.

Some proposed solutions may become political as you describe, but that doesn't change their utility as proposed solutions to the problem. Whereas it seems like the entire section "Relative to Other Countries, US Labor and Healthcare Policies are a Perfect Storm for Pandemics" could have been omitted entirely without losing any value related to slowing the spread of COVID-19.