martamoreno2

There is nothing in the making. Some government moron came up with this nonsense 30 years ago and now they just can't move past this stupid, self-defeating idea.

Is this for real? They are basically getting orgasms just because someone drills a tunnel, which is indeed revolutionary for public transportation... And it transports a whopping 4500 people per hour, will you think of that! That is almost as much as a normal, 100 year old subway train can do in a few minutes.

2.5% eh? We should all immediately stop flying... This is outrageous. Just imagine, 2.5%!!

But on a more serious note, this article is again wrong, like so many others about climate change. Being a combination of clickbait and false assumptions, it fails to miss the point entirely that first, 2.5% are irrelevant, but also that it makes no sense whatsoever to tackle this now. The technology is just not there yet.

What we urgently NEED to do is invest HUGE amounts of money into two key technologies. One is batteries. Make them as small, lightweight and efficient as possible. Pretty much everything depends on that and there has been no notable breakthrough in like forever... Without "super" batteries, we can kiss "preventing climate change" goodbye.

Another one is sucking the carbon out of the atmosphere. And no, we DON'T need to reduce our carbon emission, one of the key mistakes people make when it comes to climate change. What we need to do is to suck out more than we put in. There is no way in hell that 200 countries in the world agree on being C02 neutral. The leading countries need to suck the shit back out, that is the only way forward.

As for all the people who preach changing the entire world by reducing emissions... I mean, I get you are very naive, but seriously: It's not gonna happen. It is cute to have girl sail through the Atlantic to make so pep talk at congress. But it is also really meaningless. This is not the way the world will change. It never has. Politicians can't agree on the color of shit within their own country, not to mention between them.

The only way to avoid catastrophe is to outpace climate change with innovation. The world is not going to sacrifice living standards until they all drown in their own filth.

I wonder if he does realize that CS uses this thing called O-notation, it's really useful. So a 10x factor by the very definition of complexity theory is a zero sum game. Nobody cares. You implementation might be faster if it is optimized for a certain architecture, CPU instructions, CPU cache and so forth. It literally doesn't mean anything, it has certainly nothing to do with being more "efficient" or with Knuth not being able to make it more efficient. Optimality is discussed in O-notation, not some contrived laboratory constant factors in front of it.

I think you are wrong. Consumers use to save money, the masses at least. They won't give a shit about these details, most of them don't even know what it means. They pick the cheaper option, across the board. There might be some Intel fanboys with 5000$ machines, but those are the minority.

With businesses it is quite different. Money comes cheap. You can not get fired for buying IBM... To convince companies like Google & Amazon to build a data-center around a one-off delivery from AMD is pushing the boundaries. Now if they are 5 times cheaper, these companies might be more willing to consider betting on this outlandish horse. If it was 10% cheaper, I don't see how they could risk it, at least not at scale and scale is what AMD is interested in. Once they have some buy in at these dumping prices from large data centers, then they will sure raise the price unless Intel follows the dumping price strategy.

Not to mention that there are also other problems with business, like vendor lock-in. Consumers don't really have that problem either. They will buy what's cheaper, because they didn't sign a 10 billion $ discount from Intel for keep buying Intel in the future.

A coder does two things:

* He gets this Keyboard: https://kinesis-ergo.com/shop/advantage2/

* He reads this blog: https://www.thepaleomom.com/start-here/the-autoimmune-protoc...

And fixes himself...

Interesting comment. So your style of commenting consists of creating arbitrary statements that were not present in other people's comments, ignoring the valid claims they had and sprinkling it with a touch of stupidity of your own?

Anyone who thinks populating space and space governance at this point in time should be a priority, obviously has no idea about where our planet is heading right now. And judging by the utter uselessness of space exploration at this point in time, it's not too hard to realize that these billions spent for landing even just a rover on Mars, would be better invested in any other project that improves the place where we actually live...

If you are using a weak password, that's always a problem...

But a masterpassword for offline storage is a completely different story, because even if the world knew your masterpassword, they still couldn't do anything with it, because they need to get to your dropbox file first.

If you use similar passwords everywhere, any site can read your password and use it to login somewhere else... You are supposed to use long random passwords for websites because you have to assume that every single password gets compromised and the website you are on tries to hack all other accounts.