lurking15
what a bunch of empty invective
the universities are swimming in money, it's not an actual subsidy and in my experience ends up just crowding out native students
Knowledge in economic terms is much less definite because prices reflect subjective value.
His conclusion is that knowledge is dispersed, represented in prices that arise from markets which is simply understood as cooperation. Knowledge may frankly be expressed as whatever enables and motivates someone to offer something on the market. If that's too vague for your taste, too bad.
The wonder is that uncoordinated, independent cooperation gives rise to such abundant and sophisticated products. Not only that it's in a system that expresses everyone's individual preferences and competing interests. Central planning fails spectacularly to do this, and there's no reason to believe that it ever will even with fantastic computational power.
Not convincing since you're reducing the entire time period to The Jungle which was sensationalized fiction, effectively political propaganda.
But to your broader point, things improved directly from capitalism and markets. My reading recommendation? Deirdre McCloskey "Why Liberalism Works" on the absurd increase in living standards brought about through innovation enabled by capitalism, we're talking some 3,000% in average income over the course of time you're referring to.
Really they should be charging as high as possible directly to consumers until doctors are attracted into the profession. Cut out the middleman, there is no reason that routine expenses like a sick visit that gets routine labwork or medication need to be insured.
It'd be better to reroute the software developers that construct complex systems to SERVE ADS and addict people to scrolling.
It's hard not to see the parallel between healthcare and education where the parasitic overhead has been completely unchecked and enabled by federal subsidies. There's a similar deal with food, housing and other areas. It's absurd the amount of money that has been spent by the federal government in these areas with so little to show, the average person feels not only a lack of progress but decline.
At least part of it seems to be that the price system is completely screwed up, the doctors need to be payed more and it's obvious that the institutionalized insurance system is a root cause. When government (or their heavily regulated proxies, or any third-party for that matter) sets prices, expect services and products to deteriorate in quality.
Everyday non-emergency care should be a transaction directly between a doctor and patient. That WWII screwed up the whole system through price controls on wages and locked us in, path-dependency style, to forever paying a useless third party is nothing short of infuriating.
You seem to be pretty strident and inflexible in your thinking, so at least you recognize that you're unable to read anything that challenges your rigid precepts and offers an opportunity to expand your mind or engage in a real exchange of ideas.
And please spare me the predictable response, because it's clear that you don't care about democracy exactly, like so many others nowadays, it's an amorphous stand-in that allows you to thoughtlessly discard opposition.
If a majority of staff at a news outlet are liberal/progressive isn't that clearly a bias and hard to call independent?
I just notice that people tend to only call out institutional bias in one direction
Not only was it unscientific, to the point that they had to censor their opponents and coordinate the institutions to shun any dissenting scientists and experts, the mandate was found to be blatantly unconstitutional.
If they admitted they were wrong, they'd have to do serious self-reflection and reform their worldview, it's insulation.
There's people that recognize you're right.
Of course the root of the problem is inflation which is a result of debasement of the money, a consequence of unrestrained (federal) government spending.
In my research trying to help myself I've come to the conclusion that histamine intolerance is really more of a symptom of a larger issue. It seems to suggest SIBO or any other sort of inflammatory process in the small intestine. Reason being that dysbiosis (of which SIBO is just one sort) has multiple synergizing effects: not only that often the bacteria associated with dysbiosis will produce lots of histamine through fermentation activity (there's a certain klebsiella type I've seen implicated) but also the dysbiosis causes a cascade of issues that degrades the gut lining which increases the amount of dietary histamine that crosses into the body.
Otherwise I've seen histamine intolerance also suggestive of Crohn's, etc. where the gut lining is chronically damaged.
Like you said wine often reveals it for people, also vinegar, aged cheese, meat or seafood. It's funny that now that I know what to look for I notice when eating with people when they get a stuffy nose right after eating that stuff.
Kick Kamala Harris to the curb.
In my IBS journey I had a period where I had very strong histamine intolerance, and vitamin C (in the form of QBC vitamin, quercetin + bromelain + vitamin C) really helped stabilize me. Histamine intolerance often led to chronic insomnia, my heart just would not calm down at night.
> If there were effects, we'd have seen them by now.
You just authored a screed in response to me pointing out that there are effects.
Sharon Osbourne didn't just have mild nausea she now claims she can't put back the weight she lost that she didn't intend to lose.
> Gastroparesis is ... a slowing of gastric emptying.
I can't help but point out the syntax choice of internet snobbery. I'm not sure when people started sprinkling ellipses for dramatic effect because they seem to think it makes them authoritative but I think it's worth highlighting since it's such a reliable heuristic for internet troll.
She abruptly stopped after losing much more than she wanted to lose.
She looks ill frankly.