ls_stats

That's not going to happen, Lula has the popular vote. Even remotely comparing him with Maduro is foolish. If US did something, they would be stepping out of the shadows. That would legit cause a political crisis.

Well, I guess the key is to reward the humans that will "merge" the work done by AI into math.

It's funny because VRAM IS cheap to produce.

The biggest tell of slop UI is the intersection of fancy styling and disfunctional UX. AI absolutely cannot do UX by itself.

Well, if that's actually true, I think America needs to start talking about the nationalization of both OpenAI and Anthropic, maybe even merge both under a new federal bureau.

Is it really hard to understand that there's no good guys? Amodei, Altman, Zuckerberg, Musk, etc. They all sound the same to me.

Deepseek 0732 is $0.22/$0.66 off peak

I don't get it, Google could heavily subsidy their Gemini models to make it more attractive, but they prefer to not do it. I don't know one soul who is using Gemini models to code. Even OpenAI who doesn't have money or capacity is offering their Luna model at $1.2 per 1M/out.

Is it though? I saw a noticeable difference between Sol (xhigh) and Luna (max). Sol appears to understand better my prompts, you need to be more specific/clear with Luna.

Yeah, like bombing a children school, the CCP did that not long ago.

>My primary concern is the risk that authoritarian governments—not solely the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), although the CCP is clearly the most capable threat—build AI models that are more powerful than those built by the US, and use them to achieve permanent military superiority or perpetrate incredibly deep repression of their own people.

This reads like a satire. I know Dario isn't that dumb.

So, they are just going to ban chinese models, close their eyes and pretend that both Anthropic and OpenAI are worth $1T?

America needs its own DeepSeek or Z.ai, a lot of people (myself included) root for open chinese models to win because they have no other choice.

Thinking Machines might be it.

The most impressive part is the token efficiency/cost per task of 5.6 Sol, it makes Opus 4.8 and Fable look extremely bad ($1.04 vs $1.80 vs $2.75)[0].

And 5.6 Luna ($0.21) is also impressive, cheaper than GLM 5.2 ($0.37) with higher intelligence.

[0]: https://artificialanalysis.ai/#price-and-cost

Why are you using Openrouter as metric here? Most people use the APIs directly.

>3.5 Flash was more expensive than 3.1 Pro to run the Artifical Analysis test suite

That's everything I needed to know.

You are seeing batch inference, standard inference is $1.5/$9. I was excited until I saw that price.

Isn't Devin AI basically a scam, selling an "AI Software Engineer" when no such thing exists.

Uh... maybe because he doesn't want to use technology that gives power to someone like Elon Musk, who is well known for propagating right-wing propaganda.

>I feel like OpenAI is pursuing AGI

I don't think so, the "AGI guy" was Ilya Sutskever, he is gone, he wanted to make OpenAI "less comercial", AGI is just a buzzword for Altmann.

So... not wanting to have people around with enough money to buy a US president is... Marxism?

>I typically like Elon about 70% of the time

>I don't quite understand how he suddenly got so much influence.

then you don't know much about him

>it's actually a good UI >I just finished a small project >around 2200 lines

why the top comments on HN are always people who have not read the article

That's pretty much what Altman said about GPT-3 (or 2, I don't remember), he said it was too dangerous to release to the public.

Cool, let's see if in 2027 Anthropic still exists.

>Try loading up a library heavy site (i.e. React plus a half dozen associated helpers for state, UI and whatever, which is pretty common) on an old or cheap Android device.

that was the case in 2015 when entry level android devices were quite slow, nowdays a cheap $200 android phone has at least 4-6GB of RAM and an eight core processor.

if that isn't enough for your react powered site, you are doing something very wrong.

>If you want to create a religion

I think he is making an allusion to Apple's culture.

There's successful companies because their product is good, there's more successful companies because they started early (and it feels like a monopoly: Google, Microsoft), and there's the most successful company that tells you what you are going to buy (Apple's culture).