loopglitch26

I think Anthropic models take up a lot of credits and tokens in coding, every big-tech employee is overdependent on Claude and Opus at work, and the cost outcome is not the same as the input by the developers.

I feel like fewer refusals = better reviewer, so false positives and false negatives in open models as compared to closed ones, matter. If you read Anthropic's post on GLM 5.3 you can see that it has good auditing capabilities. But I think if you push Opus 5.5 it can also show great results unless it's constrained by safety check

at this rate open ai will be "something" without it's people

i think so