longb4

> I still have not seen proof of a SINGLE woman who plays grand strategy games.

We exist. We generally are not motivated to provide proof that we exist, especially because many requests for proof are expected in the form of "SEND NUDES". That was not implied in your comment, but your experience likely consists of this exchange and mine reflects a universe of incredulity and harassment.

If you gain insight from reading this, great. But that's not why I'm replying. Somewhere reading this thread is a girl in high school or a woman in college who's into grand strategy, or programming, or something else that's "uniquely intellectual". She's heard messages all her life that girls and women aren't the kinds of people who do this stuff. I know this because I've been that girl - going back decades to where I would read "I'm pretty sure there are no 12 year old girls using Linux", at age 12, from my dual boot Fedora/Debian machine.

Sis, you matter, even if you're just starting to get into this. If we only look at gaming, I've had thousands of hours across Factorio, Paradox games, Zachtronics games, and study sims (not to mention - gasp - mass market tactics games), but you can't get to hour #1000 without hour #1. Whether you choose to keep a low profile in nerd spaces or you choose to be a Girl Gamer (TM) lightning rod, I'm glad you're here, and I hope you pay more attention to comments like mine than the one above mine.

If I _had_ to put it in a tree, PoE or solar+battery would probably work. In my tiny yard I could probably get away with a regular outdoor extension cord.

My solution would be a fake birdhouse. It could be weatherproof and less conspicuous, and the hole on the front is a natural place to put a camera lens. (You might want to put a fake bird on top or something to dissuade actual birds.)

Hey there! Big fan of your articles and videos. I've been building box joints recently and even though the forces they're subjected to are not nearly as pathological as what you tested, I enjoyed your box joints and dovetails strength testing article: https://woodgears.ca/dovetail/strength.html

Quick question: do you recall what wood you used for the box/dovetail article? It looks similar to the spruce from the earlier joint strength article. I suppose using a stronger wood would just get you closer to where the glue is failing more than the wood, but I'm just curious.

Less-quick question, feel free to punt/ignore: any thoughts on deliberately building in a very, very slight gap between box joint fingers? I would expect this to reduce joint strength (thanks to reduced force between fingers and surface area in contact) but potentially also mitigate wood stress from movement in service due to humidity. Though I imagine if a work piece is big enough for me to be concerned about movement in service, I probably shouldn't be using box joints!

The EFF has a service called Panopticlick[1] that gives you a sense of how unique your browser looks to the sites you visit. My result: "Within our dataset of several million visitors, only one in 886,262 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours."

[1] https://panopticlick.eff.org