lokidokiro
Re:US Wages Finally Get Back to Where They Were in 1973
on Friday April 19, 2019 @12:31PM (#19700844)
Another way of writing the same title that sounds completely different: "Inflation adjusted US wages reach highest level since 1973."
I'll never understand what compels journalists (or wannabe journalists) to insert words like "finally" into their headlines. It would have been just fine without that one word.
Re:How the 0.001% invest
on Monday December 17, 2018 @05:40PM (#18702917)
Labor begets wealth. What are you trying to say here?
Re:Facial recognition: It’s time for action
on Saturday December 08, 2018 @02:38AM (#18634317)
You clearly don't get it. What if facial recognition technology can be replaced with body recognition technology? Do you ban all forms of recognition technology? That would criminalize a lot of legitimate uses for machine learning.
Re:They Rejected Us
on Friday December 07, 2018 @02:29PM (#18630751)
The statement seems to imply that he would have gotten offered if he had been able to answer whatever this question was. There's no way he can know that.
It seems more likely that he was shaky in his other interviews which all added up to him being rejected. If you're an interviewer and the interviewee is doing poorly, do you tell them they're failing? I certainly don't.
Re:They Rejected Us
on Friday December 07, 2018 @12:31PM (#18629583)
Google interviews are four hours long and they don't tell you how did after the interview. There's no way he can possibly know the reason he got rejected.