llpg

I'm sorry but you are reducing a career to a mere interest.

Changing hobbies is not the same as trying to change what you did for a living for the past decade.

This.

Per Hyrum's law, someone will rely on any given behavior. So, if you choose backwards compatibility, it becomes harder for the committee to evolve the language over time.

The path of breaking changes can be made less painful, and does not, necessarily, invalidate all the code that is already written.

With that being said, the problem right now is not the decision of keeping backwards compatibility or not, but the fact that the standard should be explicit about it, so people know what to expect.

That was quite an interesting read... I was astonished by how awful their response to the criticism was: https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/04/16/reinhart-rogoff...

Personally, that just killed his credibility.