lightfield1002
Something needs to pay for them. I rather pay than have my privacy violated and sold to every ad company on this planet.
What could be improved is how to pay. I don't want 50+ different subscriptions.
Which is a bit ironic since there was a time where browsers would routinely open popups in new windows, upon which it was immediately misused by ads, upon which browsers implemented counter measures. We're just in the next iteration of this.
Most non-technical people in the 40+ age range that I know are well aware what .zip was and still is.
Please don't consider your circle of peers in their 20s as a representative sample of society.
Yes, something very substantial has changed.
And everybody told you, all the time, and you chose not to listen. That's your choice, no worries.
But threatening physical harm to the con man you fell for is just not ok.
> I sincerely hope that I never meet Sam Bankman Fried, because if I did I do not know what I would do but it certainly wouldn't be legal.
Why is this statement not condemned? Of course it's terrible that SBF was a fraud. But insinuating that physical harm is justified is just not ok. They were the naïve ones who bought into the BS, waived away all the warning voices, and now they are threating violence? Not ok.