lele92n
Amazon and Pets.com didn’t possess truly novel tech, to a trained eye
I don’t think truly novel tech matters much to most people.
I think ease of utilitarian life is good enough
We don’t need the energy sucking monstrosity that are the data centers we have if we looked at different models of commerce
This is just getting people to be tribal over something that appears magical but will fade out
Goodhart’s Law, Buffets Institutional imperative, and similar ideas, will win out. Human quest for novelty will end bitcoin and its tribal urges for nostalgia and fetishizing their LEGO train
Humanity doesn’t care to ogle dead men’s workshops showcasing their individual brilliance for long
There’s plenty of precedent
I think lack of safety features that meet our current common knowledge of the potential failure scenarios should be enough to shut down a company
We can refuse to enable commerce that jeopardizes or personal safety (literal or ephemeral data theft)
Capitalists are just humans. They can be culturally pressured and shunned. Such behavior has been a hallmark of human society since they began
Physics is a vacuum of such rules. Human society has always had them
When they say “weakening” that seems like an emotionally overloaded choice picked for cultural resonance.
Is it really a weakening or just a new model to acclimate to and tweak as needed to ensure outcomes?
Why is giving any ground or change always coming along with “we won’t be strong in the same way!” rhetoric
Duh but that doesn’t negate the argument for change given other data over here
We’ve yet to discover a unified theory of reality
I highly doubt our system of social governance has found an equivalent
It has to change. It will change if history is any indicator
Better to have the conversations ourselves then leave it up to experts across the world