News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

lchang

Yes, but the New York Times employs top-notch webdevs.

See http://open.blogs.nytimes.com/ and http://www.nytimes.com/projects/2012/snow-fall/

So they have the skills, but maybe it's for other reasons they don't follow those practices.

Re:Seamless Transitioning from Google Reader to feedly on Wednesday March 13, 2013 @08:27PM (#5372246)
Import my tags and folders and you're good.

The RSS feed isn't the problem - it's the hundreds of hours I've put into curating content.

Re:Introducing A New Article Design on Tuesday March 12, 2013 @02:49PM (#5364043)
There's a ton of product manager, designers, and researchers on Hacker News. But looking at his profile seems to indicate that Mr. Clarks a pretty humble guy.
Re:Google Maps for iOS on Thursday December 13, 2012 @12:06AM (#4914306)
I tried to go to an address about 2 miles from Cupertino - and Apple maps redirected me to the exact same address, except in the city next door.
Re:Google Maps for iOS on Thursday December 13, 2012 @12:04AM (#4914297)
Probably eventual Google Now support.
Re:Google+ Is Growing at Facebook Speed on Friday December 07, 2012 @12:49AM (#4885676)
The first sentence in the article.
Re:A Faster Facebook for iOS on Thursday August 23, 2012 @01:28PM (#4423671)
> the model of iOS UX.

Are you sure? It's better, yes, but it's not a model of UX and on an iPad it seems not much thought was taken into making it a truly universal app. There's a lot of unused space and everything is too large.

The Google+ app with its combo of Path and Flipboard is a much better model to follow. Fast, and it takes advantage of the screen size in both versions.

The Business Insider can be a bit on the sensationalist side. I don't want to say tabloid but they're around TechCrunch levels of overexaggeration.