kradem
I really liked that term, but someone pointed out to me it's not really a PC term.
Do you have another suitable term in that English language capable to describe this consequence of Oliver's tremendous achievement of carrying bunch of people around on his dick?
Mexico is everybody's worst nightmare, but our kids there left them just with the crumbs in 2:1 victory in the front of 70K Mexican supporters.
Too bad this kid is so young and chooses to play f##### sucker instead of football, he could even participate on the Croatia's bench close to Mateo Kovačić, Marko Pjaca and Nikola Vlašić next year when we'd finally take the damn cup in Russia.
Kristijan Mate Pulišić is the next good reason why I would continue to support USA football team as I always have supported. USA and Mexico are the best tournament playing squads in the world and watching them in Russia will be pleasure.
Too bad for Klinsmann, he afaic made the top technical move in Brasil, 5-1-3-1 with Dempsey in the middle of the field in the front of defenders and as the first part of three men axis with Jermaine Jones in the centre and Chris Wondolowski at the top. Iirc they had played just one half of one match or so in that formation, but it was enjoyable to watch it just like Sampaoli's Chile triangle of terrier midfielders.
May threaten democracy
May threaten democracy
May threaten democracy
This way, repeated, sounds weird, not just dumb as it was at first...
There's an account you may access if you know the username and respective password or if you may access account's primary email.
So, just think of the account as your locker in Lyft's building. When someone with your telephone number enters that number and enters back received code, that implies he's the owner of the number.
The credit card is still under your account and there could be no relation to the other user's telephone number. The triggered routine would confirm the connection of the user and their telephone and nothing else.
Today's cryptography is like the ice sculptures art, we could show a lot, but on unstable timeline.
The true art is going to come with the quantum computers and the governments will have to have legislative for someone sending messages to someone else because they won't have any other tool available.
Far-right populism is imho these days a kind of oxymoronish syntagm.
F###### Apple is just the f##### bank in the process where you develop goods consumed by your customers. By chance that bank is the same company as the owner of the platform you're using to reach your customers.
P.S. I was trying to get rid of programming ten years ago and I talked to entrepreneur I knew, wished to switch to my original profession through the job he offered. He tought of me as overqualified, but we agreed very soon - after I confirmed I'll work 168 hours/month for starting 400€...
P.P.S. Croatia...
So with the AMA too, you're kind of thinking some politician would tell you things in four eyes differently than they would do in front of the millions.
That's the feature dude, not a bug!
The rest is politics - in 20th society turned a deaf ear to the hint of the holocaust and artist like Dylan had well shaped our souls afterwards.
At the end of that century there was a war in the middle of Europe only few understood at that time and those few are even decimated these days.
Zaev took the cabinet yesterday and there's no link on HN about that and that's fine. Still, don't think because of that that Zaev wasn't the greatest news in European politics this year.
And about daily politics, what you guys think it would have greater impact on US economy: Paris withdrawn or Riyadh drawn?
That is unprecedented, and the other part, the answers, are just an usual part of the process - "unordinary they" could use and have used all the tools society has developed since the beginning how to not answer if that suits them. That's called diplomacy.
What he would say today when every eagle's goal is the good cage and feeder?
https://damiravdic.bandcamp.com/track/bog-je-koncept
Damir Avdić - God is concept
________
Everything worth "reading" about ex-Yu wars and world/EU politics one could find in the works of this guy, afaic the greatest artist of 21. century - the position took in 20th century by the Jew is now taken by the Muslim.
There's nothing here in the thread powered by "my logic". I'm just certain that dark matter, ether, the Holy Grail, or anything, could be abandoned in our minds once we find the prettier chick to cope with, no matter how well we understood the previous one.
If it's valuable it would end up as git committed record in sqlite Trac database, and simply erased if not.
It's not a concept, it's just my lousy English and awkward abbreviation of "to the point where" with "fully".
I'm here just to play a game of logic.
Did we dismiss the ether at the point when we managed to understand it better/enough or we managed to dismiss it after we started to play with other cards?
> But, dark matter isn't something to be denied. Because it isn't understood yet, to the point where we can doubt its existence
I'm lousy in English and my knowledge of dark matter is irrelevant. With those two lemmas in mind, please answer the only question in this subthread:
could something be dismissed if we don't fully understand it?
It doesn't matter if that - what we dismissed - shapeshifts into something completely different (or similar...) afterward, on the contrary, regarding resources spent it would be sad if not.
I know nothing about dark matter, but I could play a zero-sum game based on this article content - just the way anybody else could play - and outcome of that game is according to this article proven theory of this guy denies dark matter and dark energy theory.
And that's all, we could prove bad logic here without waiting for the third season of Dark Matter to be broadcasted.
The article is positioned on the principle that was imagined based on wrong assumtions of other theory and which acceptance will dissmiss the other theory.
I'm not even being close to think of being positioned on a side there, but afaic one could easily take one in this subthread.
TL; DR yep, dark matter could be denied no matter of the state of its understanding - just bring the better explanation of those irregularities its existence explains!
Channels is now stable and provides out of box solution where all of your existing logic goes under 'http.request' channel and you may just append new websockets functionality to your existing projects.
Development server ('python manage.py runserver') would do the job of running both Daphne server and workers, and in the production you could keep your existing wsgi configuration (nginx + gunicorn, ...) and use Daphne and workers just on particular urls (or configuring specific headers).