kouroshh
Re:Fine-Tuning Llama-2: A Comprehensive Case Study for Tailoring Custo...
on Friday August 11, 2023 @03:33PM (#37092932)
Hey, I am one of the co-authors of the post. So the training data for ViGGO has about 5.1k rows which we trained with a block size of 512 (you can lower the block size if you want but we didn't do so because it was just easier to not change code :)). On 16xA10Gs for 7B it took ~15 min per epoch and on 13B it took ~25 min per epoch. So the on-demand cost per epoch is ~$7.2 for 7B and ~$12 for 13B. This is based on the time only spent on the training part and does not take into account the cluster startup time and shutdown time.
Re:Fine-Tuning Llama-2: A Comprehensive Case Study for Tailoring Custo...
on Friday August 11, 2023 @02:02PM (#37091774)
Would be good to see a rigorous analysis of these PEFT methods on quality. There still seems to be a debate on whether these methods sacrifice quality or not.
Re:Fine-Tuning Llama-2: A Comprehensive Case Study for Tailoring Custo...
on Friday August 11, 2023 @01:59PM (#37091723)
Llama-2-chat models have been overly fine-tuned to be like this. You can give a few-shot prompting a try, but they still don't gurantee a desired output. The best way to guarantee is to fine-tune on small (~1k) data points and go from there.
Re:Fine-Tuning Llama-2: A Comprehensive Case Study for Tailoring Custo...
on Friday August 11, 2023 @01:56PM (#37091690)
Training times for GSM8k are mentioned here: https://github.com/ray-project/ray/tree/master/doc/source/te...