kev6168
$ time python pyrb.py
real 348m35.965s
user 345m51.776s
sys 0m22.880s
$ time pypy pyrb.py
real 14m2.406s
user 13m55.292s
sys 0m1.416sSo not being able to rely on search, people have to memorize companies' urls, to type them into address bar and pass along to others the actual url string. Internet companies are forced to display them predominantly in ads. So a domain name that is cute/easy(often costing ridiculus amount) is all that more important in China than elsewhere.
Google please come back, it will be a net gain for humanity.
Just want to say thank you to the developers of Firefox. Thank you for all the hard work to continue to improve a great product.
One liners are fun, and life-saving. I am curious about this aspect compared to Perl 5. With Perl 6's new syntax and language features, can we still easily [ab]use one liners for fun and profit?
The majority of videos on Douyin belong to one of these three categories, 1, girls putting on crazy amount of makeup staring at the camera or lip syncing. The platforms's software are often used to make the eyes larger and legs longer, to ridiculous degree. 2, cats, dogs and other pets, 3, tens of thousands of people imparting universal wisdom to you on how to get rich quickly, become a skillful pickup artist or life guru, etc.
Other than these three types, there are very little left. Of course you may find it differently. But IMO shortage of quality content will be a big problem going forwad for these platforms. In general most people in every country don't have the skill to produce videos of good quality, coupled with China's tight control on what can be shown, it's becoming suffocating for creativity. For example comedies or poignant news commentaries are very rare. A lack of respect for intellectual rights is still a problem in China, endless copying and pasting and boring and fake stuff. Anyway, content shortage is a problem everywhere, but it's just terribly bad in China.
Also, unlike say Facebook or Wechat, these video platforms lack the relationships between users that keep people around. Sure you can leave messages on Douyin but there are basically zero long term interactions going on. People on Douyin always tell others to meet at Wechat or Weibo or other places. Douyin is simply not made for social networking, and I don't see it can change that.
Is this "matter of fact" mindset an unique trait of European cultures? No judgement is passing here, I am only curious about the thinking and mindset. I would venture to guess that nations of other cultures in modern days probably would feel very uncomfortable to openly display artifacts sourced in similar ways.
On the other hand, this form (of convenience and simple pleasure) matches our basic desire, imo. So maybe it will continue to develop and expand.
I should say Douyin/Tik Tok is also great for people to express themselves, to create artistic content, to provide valuable content. So potato chip or bubble gum are naturally not very accurate descriptions.
The app opens in sub-second and then starts playing a video right away, the video is also selected to conform to your previous likings. Or I also like to say it's the mobile phone era's bubble gums, a source of endless simple pleasure. Of course there are also many videos providing valuable educational content.
From my own experience, I feel Douyin has enforced pretty strict policies regarding what video are acceptable. A while ago I submitted a video about early day internet success stories such as eBay/PlentyOfFish/etc., it was rejected repeatedly. No reasons were given and I didn't bother to ask. I suspect it's because I had words "rich"/"money"/"quick success" in the description. You often hear other people's complaints in their videos, such as "My last one was deleted by Douyin and I don't know why." Anyway, it's just my one anecdote.
Take Douyin as an example, it has a few hundred million users, 40% to 50% of them are under age 24 and live in smaller cities or rural areas, according to various reports. Growing up with mobile internet, for them shopping on the phone while hanging around in social networks is very natural, it's personal, it's fun. That's why most sellers have already set up account in Wechat/Weibo (and recently Douyin), not to publish product listing bluntly, but to post soft articles, funny videos, a lot of them even live stream their daily activities, to try to build up followers.
I think with the mature infrastruture already in place(delivery, payment, messaging such like video chatting with the sellers, etc.), young people in rural areas care less about how big the online store is, but more about quality and fun. Plus, browsing product and talking to many shop owners on the phone are super easy while lying on the couch, something hard to do in the PC era, so it's easy to search good deals all over the places, no need to buy all items from one big store.
Also thanks to mobile phone, young people in rural areas have pretty good access to product information compared to their peers in the big cities. What they lack mostly are good education and job opportunities.
But on the other hand, details of personal stories of various characters in the article made me grumbling "Really?! Is this from the New Yorker?".
Just one example, in the story about her parents sending her to stay with relatives in an extremely poor village before they left China for the US, the author wrote, "I wouldn’t see meat for three months;" and "that hunger could feel like a demon clawing at your stomach. ".
Come on, that was in 1992 when China had already got into economic reform for fourteen years(starting in 1978). Not matter how remote the village is, three months without meat for the daughter of your powerful relative? To make things even less believable, don't forget her mother was a doctor at an Army hospital in a big city, that's absolutely in the upper echelon in China financially in the 1980s. It's probably comparable to a $300K/year doctor in the US today relative to the rest of population, not to mention how few Chinese had the means and connections to immigrate (not merely visit) to US in that period of time, so how can you not be shocked to read that her parents would let their daughter go hungry and have no meat for three months?
These and some other passages made me enjoy a lot less of the article. I don't blame her because first the country and the people have gone through dramatic changes since she came to the states, and secondly even the New Yorker has to make things attractive to the mass in order to sell.
JD has been doing great but I think it (and Taobao of Alibaba) has the great risk of losing the young generation (born after year 2000) who are less interested in these big box online sellers but more likely to buy from small invidual sellers, based on friends' recommendations or the sellers' promotions on social networks. For example, some of the new thriving places like Pinduoduo and Douyin (similar to Musical.ly, in fact Douyin bought Musical.ly recently) are very popular nowadays. The old giants might be gone within ten years because the ways to do ecommerce are changing so fast in China.
Remember even as of today AI can compete on a high level of huge video games, face recognition, natural language processing, playing Go/Chess game, etc. Imagine in 30 years, all the robots, armed with AI and made of materials a few times stronger than whatever we have today, should be able to scan, learn, adapt and go. Another minor point, the robots can probably carry some heavy machines (or laser guns) and just pound hard on the cave's narrow sections to make the passage wider. Etc.
What are your thoughts on how technology advancement in the next 30 years would change the way of this kind of rescue mission? Say in 2040, can a group of robots finish the mission in one day with ease? That will be awesome, people can be rescued from bad situations much sooner.
* Only check out the first screen of any news web site. No scrolling down, and no clicking links.*
Implementation details: I keep around 10 news sites in a bookmark folder. Through out a day, I right click on the folder and open all of the sites at once, then spend on average 5 to 10 seconds on each site. Do this three or four times each day.
Been pretty happy doing this for a few years now.