keko039ndnfm
They decide if the inside of the box is working correctly in an undemocratic fashion, based upon their biases
Not the correctness of the US judiciary system itself
Thomas Jefferson advocated for a system that would allow future generations to reasses it’s Constitution and laws, and adjust as necessary
We got James Madison’s version of government, who described the Senate as a legislative body to protect the rich minority from the poor majority. Thus the justice system evolved over time only assessing laws and building its existence on questions of property rights and ownership.
Not saying it’s scandalous or wrong but it’s only concerned with internal consistency, like India.
Look at how the GOP is largely pushing a platform that’s hundreds of years old, with an outcome that resembles the way things were before the New Deal
It’s just old guys advocating for their personal feelings. Exactly what the person from India said :shrug:
The masses are bought in and ignore it
Not one of the judges on the SC questions the correctness of the process
They just regurgitate the things they’ve been taught and studied
There is no more outside the box consideration of the system here than there is in India
And this forum is just as emotionally blind to it as all the others
How much a candidate raises has been correlated to ability to win.
That eliminates anyone that can’t raise money.
And Kavanaugh’s nomination casts doubt on the third statement. You can be a vile POS, but become a SCOTUS judge so long as you’re networked with the right people.
So yeah.
Big corps are making huge profits while laying people off.
Pursuit of an outcome alone isn’t enough. The process too must be in service to humanity at large to reach your conclusion.
Too many processes today benefit a minority.