keel-control
keel-control on Hacker News
no signs of mega tsunami damage outside of the shore
- "News reporter says in the 50km radius shadow of a tsunami large enough to block out the sun"
They are going to run out of vulns eventually when the code is rewritten in memory safe lang & the rest are found.
ASPD perhaps which would also explain his fast life type strategies of high risk high reward low impulse control decisions. Which in this case led to success.
Reminds of the veritassium video where it said being persistent is more valuable than being consistent in the sense that you only need to win the lottery once to be rich forever. Whereas you can consistently work a job for an indefinite quantity of time and never be rich.
denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance
this is a good idea ngl
an unpopular one but very effective
Coding is literally solved with current models. It's just a matter of inference cost at this point. Imagine if Astra 6 Max was $0.00001 per 1M ouput...
I can't think of a single example apart from perhaps the 99.9th percentile difficulty of work that wouldn't be solvable with that configuration.
I just rewrote it on my device in ratatui using codex in 16 minutes and it uses 10x less RAM 150MB -> 15MB
the binary file is 10MB
Why don't we have privacy respecting ZKP Age IDs yet (at least in the EU)? Could someone tell me what the hold up is.
I wish I could paste this as a prompt into a Codex Swarm and have it solve the government...
At least that would have more immediate impacts that the naiver stokes equations
This was my first thought after they disallowed LLM contributions.
They may not use AI to check for vulnerabilities but attackers are going to which puts themselves at the disadvantage.
you can get another LLM to verify / if the lean doesn't have `sorry` used to skip certain parts of the proof etc. It's much easier once it's in lean4 because checks like that can be done computationally.
there is a proof in lean4 it's correct by construction
I get worried when thinking about Mistral because they make mediocre models and I don't think they will be able to defeat their competition.
ok for this CVE exactly it wouldn't have worked
but the general pareto 80-20 rule stands regarding the rest of the memory safety vulns
Google has the means and ability to rewrite Chromium ; bug for bug in Rust from C++ using Astra & Fable.
Same for the Linux kernel. Considering the Fermat's Last Theorem lean proof was 13MLoC and cost $300,000 it would cost $2M to rewrite Chromium & Linux in Rust going purely of combined LoC.
The same people who would petition against ZKP Internet IDs complaining about the unregulated internet.
You can't have your cake and eat it too...
Now imagine he were a mathematician instead of a software engineer.
The post sounds rather backwards in this scenario.
glm 5.3 flash is the best model I have ever used
I was thinking about this anti AI sentiment and how it is related to American individualism. In socialist countries like China there has never been a protest related to data centres or job loss etc. unlike in the USA. Because the large scale impact of AI on the country is exclusively a net positive.
The reduction of the individuals cost of labour by also reduces perceived egalitarianism which is the mental model used by ultra capitalists to allow themselves to sleep at night whilst homeless people beg for food on the streets.
The long term impact of AI on society is exclusively a net positive if utilised in the correct way. But most of the westerners lack faith in government fiscal policy and think that they are going to be left destitute when they can no longer provide for themselves. When in fact UBI is going to be the most likely outcome.
They are myopically focusing on the short term labour market effects of AI on their own profession instead of realising the long term utopian societal outcome.
"We need to ban AI because I'm going to lose my job!" - This is only said by someone who is winning in their society and wants to maintain the status quo not by those who slipped through the cracks.
[copy and pasted comment from a similar post]
I was thinking about this anti AI sentiment and how it is related to American individualism. In socialist countries like China there has never been a protest related to data centres or job loss etc. unlike in the USA. Because the large scale impact of AI on the country is exclusively a net positive.
The reduction of the individuals cost of labour by also reduces perceived egalitarianism which is the mental model used by ultra capitalists to allow themselves to sleep at night whilst homeless people beg for food on the streets.
The long term impact of AI on society is exclusively a net positive if utilised in the correct way. But most of the westerners lack faith in government fiscal policy and think that they are going to be left destitute when they can no longer provide for themselves. When in fact UBI is going to be the most likely outcome.
They are myopically focusing on the short term labour market effects of AI on their own profession instead of realising the long term utopian societal outcome.
"We need to ban AI because I'm going to lose my job!" - This is only said by someone who is winning in their society and wants to maintain the status quo not by those who slipped through the cracks.
there's still JEPA to be integrated before AGI.
Would DiffusionGemma be suitable candidate for DFlash 2?
there's still ego & competition against other humans which is what I do to distract myself