kbsspl
instead it was the worst sellout ever, using the greatest power in time, to build megaliths that have humongous power of distortion.
yes, it hurts. and it should. much more. but they manage to make people to 'move on'.
in the end. we forgot. It's always about power.
Politicians can get away doing what they want with whatever reason.
And politicians are being used to make the internet more opaque. Since 'view source' is being made a scapegoat, expect it to disappear soon.
Let there be no standards.
It's created by individuals like us and should be available via maybe archive.org as a complete dump for individuals to play with.
Are they available ?
Other than a bit of convenience, Uber is a technocracy push.
Remember, effectively you have said law breaking is acceptable. In this case, it may be partly even true, but once this catches on, anarchy, literally one step away.
A great example of a 'forced perspective'. The entire ecosystem of browsers, standards, devices, business imperatives is being forcefully turned into a spa/mpa comparison.
Vehemently disagree with the 'access denied' error message. Why would you want some one who does not have access to a table to know it exists.
Social Media anonymity is often used to incite riots in many parts of the world.
And obviously, in tyrannical regimes, de-anonymysing is a issue.
The third issue is defining who is tyrannical.
Can you please elaborate.
>Before anyone questions my religion, I am Hindu from north India (Uttarakhand Purohit clan to be specific)
What Vedanta school of interpretation are you talking about.
And I kept arguing that in a decade and a half, there would be a consolidated monolith and individuals would loose power for a long time to come.
Whenever there is a power tool, expect the power hungry to want to control it. My personal motto. Proves right every time.
Anti competitive behavior, I would think comes automatically with such massive centralisation. What's scary is the ability to mass incite riots, using knowledge of the most susceptible audience to fake news and pushing it out incendiary posts to exactly that audience. India has faced multiple such incidents already. Deliberate ? Maybe in the sense of affinity algorithms.
With the backdrop of the Stanford experiment, and a host of other biases giving almost tribal warrior behavior, should such affinity data be allowed for collection ?
My apologies if this sounds drastic, but data collection generates micro nukes, generated based on turning individuals into an array of microcrucibles.