News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

jpeterman

Re:Do not Draw a Penis on Friday May 15, 2020 @12:48AM (#23188996)
hot dog, not hot dog.
Re:BountySource suspended from GitHub on Tuesday November 21, 2017 @10:15AM (#15748352)
He said ELABORATE, "to develop or present in detail". Your explanation for them being a "borderline bad actor" is sparse to say the least.
Re:UC Berkeley research fellow Michael Cohen dies at 25 on Wednesday October 04, 2017 @07:25PM (#15405652)
Well co-author. First author is one thing, co-author is another. And I no way mean any disrespect to someone who obviously has contributed a great deal to his field.
Re:Is StubHub's Website Deceiving Users? on Monday September 11, 2017 @07:45PM (#15223503)
"Act now while supplies last"
Re:Evan Doorbell's Classic Phreaking Tapes on Thursday September 07, 2017 @04:42PM (#15195514)
My understanding is that this guy was a telephone "phreaker" (hacker enthusiast) and I gather he traveled a lot and would use pay phones and record them as he did.

The "tapes" are him narrating over these old tapes many years later explaining what he was doing. Much of it is him dialing various numbers and listening to the beeps/boops/kachunks and explaining exactly what is happening technically to route the call.

Re:Area code 710 on Saturday June 10, 2017 @11:00PM (#14530381)
Every time I see posts like this on HN, I feel obligated to post http://www.evan-doorbell.com/production/

I originally discovered this guy from HN and the audio recordings on that site are mesmerizing to me.

Re:Super Mario Run on Thursday December 15, 2016 @11:44PM (#13191131)
Re:Mystery of London fog that killed 12,000 finally solved on Tuesday December 13, 2016 @06:24PM (#13172268)
> and measuring the atmosphere in China, which is home to 16 of the 20 most polluted cities in the world.

I wonder what the source is on this.

I only spent a minute Google searching, but the numbers I'm seeing put China WAY below 16 of the top 20.

Re:Abandoned Apple Store in Kuwait on Monday November 28, 2016 @06:39PM (#13059375)
The photos appear to have been taken in January of 2005

From the photographer: "I passed by an old Apple Store today. I used to pass by this store back when I was still in highschool. I used to admire the macs they had on display and always beg my parents to buy me one.. which they never did. Surprisingly the store hasn't changed much. It was freaky checking out the place from the outside. It's as if the shop was stuck in its own time-zone. The shop seems to have been closed ages ago. A thick layer of dust sits on top of everything. What struck me the most though were the "Think Different" banners. They're gorgeous and seeing them in the store window gathering dust and being unappreciated pissed me off. The place felt like a graveyard. In a way it was, the rainbow logo, the beige machines, the old Think Different banners, the Garamond typeface, etc. That's the Apple that existed when I first started using Macs, and its all gone now. On a brighter note, I read that an Official Apple Store will be opening in March here in Kuwait. That should prove to be interesting. More pictures [here]"

Source: http://www.miskan.com/2005_01_01_archive.html

From a commenter: "I used to work at this shop in 1995 or so. The shop didn't look any different when I used to work there. It's right across the road from the Meridien hotel, with lots of expensive designer shops in the ground floor and such."

Re:Am I Introverted, or Just Rude? on Saturday September 24, 2016 @10:36PM (#12573612)
I knew I had come across this idea before:

http://www.theonion.com/article/seemingly-shy-woman-really-j...

Re:Inappropriate Uses of Google Trends on Monday June 27, 2016 @06:12PM (#11989940)
The only really valid part of the linked article is the point about how you can't make sweeping generalizations based on a very small sample size and a (relatively) small trend.

Concluding that people probably know what the EU is while searching very specifically using the phrase "What is the EU" is no more accurate or truthful than concluding that they don't know what the EU is.

The author says at one point, "perhaps we can more likely conclude". Perhaps we can. But perhaps we shouldn't make any conclusions and just stick to the thesis that the press should know better when reporting facts?