josh-wrale

Memory bandwidth, ecosystem compatibility, compute power.

Isn’t this based in contract law? The terms are between the user and Anthropic, no? If a person chooses to open source their convos, they are in violation? on what grounds?

I’m thinking you mean that nature does not possess the ability to care at all.

This would be felonious

Where are the measurements?

"I started introducing myself as Doctor."

I think the trick is to use LLMs like scalpels instead of hammers. That said, you can place a scalpel in the hands of a deterministic (or not) robot.

Concern is more about folks that work at places that don't understand about article quality. Otherwise, +1

NSFW site...

Makes me wonder if paid Medium and paid news are input to AI training. Surely, they are.

Claude can produce code that is professionally reviewed and found to be correct.

Interesting mention of Lean...

Allow list for phone numbers. All else goes to VM. Job done.

It looks almost like my handwriting, too. I looked it up and he was left handed just like me.

I can see this being applied to hubcaps in the future.

I agree with this. I have a dual rtx4090 machine, a 128gb m5 max mbp, and a dgx spark. RedHatAI/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-FP8-dynamic on the dual rtx4090 machine under vLLM absolutely slays at token speed. I'm frustrated with how hard it is to realize goodness on the dgx spark.

Related post of mine: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48946283

It's interesting that the same mistake of free floating towers was made by multiple models.

I believe the title is true for humanity at large, more and more over time. These things cut both ways, for both good and ill.

Cc can be used with non Anthropic models.

Don't like Siri but want CarPlay? oops, nope.

It strikes me that Karpathy's Auto Research loop might trigger this...

Is Wikimedia going to go IPO?

Surely, the motivation here is a mega influx of training data.

How about green screen + rotate the strawberry on a skewer

Someone: Please combine microscopy with gaussian splatting.

How likely is this about collection of LLM training data?

I am not a researcher in this field. I have read a lot about APOE4, and nearly everything I have seen about APOE4 makes it out to be the clearest of all predictors for Alzheimer's. I get that you're upset that I posted like I did, but I am not trolling. The point was that genetic causes are not an exceptional predictor for Alzheimer's. I had a hard time seeing how the best established predictor for Alzheimer's validates there being too many things labeled as Alzheimer's. If I had posted with a focus on some edge case, then it probably would have made more sense to me, but as I read it, it really seemed like a stretch.

Dropping this thread now. I am fine with being wrong, but my brief posting was not trolling.