jonhuber
Like roads, it doesn't necessarily make sense to have competition in the last mile space, two fibers/cables/etc running to the same dwelling. New Zealand and Australia have created infrastructure companies for creating a whole sale last mile network. Like deregulated electric or gas, the infrastructure provider is responsible for handling the physical connection while service provider provides the actual service over the infrastructure. In the case of internet in Australia, the NBN provides the fiber connection and the ISP provides network connectivity. It is even possible to have two ISPs over the single fiber.
Got a terrible ISP. Churn and burn. However, if all the ISPs are terrible, then you probably still need net neutrality.
Really, you need both. Structural separation, so at least there is some choice. Net neutrality rules, so companies can't monetize their customer.
Disclaimer: Australia's NBN is a bit of a mess due to politics, but New Zealand did it right with UFB.
I have a Nexus 5 and use NFC payments via Google Pay and Bank Apps. In my opinion, they both are terrible from ease of use standpoint. Tapping my card on the terminal is far superior to opening an app and fumbling with it. As far as Apple is concerned, I think they are completely in the wrong in not letting other apps use NFC. Ideally, they win market share by creating the better experience. The banks getting together to negotiate terms is ridiculous too. In my opinion, an ideal outcome would be open NFC use on Apple devices. The better experience wins. I do not think collectively negotiating terms does anything for the consumer.
11/02/13 12/03/13 15/02/13 14/03/13
So disappointing when you realize the apartment isn't available until next month.