News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

jon128

Re:Ask HN: Who is hiring? (November 2026) on Monday November 02, 2026 @06:19PM (#50345544)
> Those fucking rent-seeking hyperscalers took the

Someone speaks my language <3

_

This could really take off if the leadership can demonstrate remote-native work patterns. The on-site requirement is low oxygen.

Re:Ask HN: Who is hiring? (November 2026) on Monday November 02, 2026 @06:12PM (#50345465)
The roles descriptions are compelling and attractive in and of themselves. But all details and surrounding context considered, this looks really tough to recruit for.
Kubernetes' core pieces of userspace software, not with any implied support from the Kubernetes project, also run on illumos, FreeBSD (and HardenedBSD), and OpenBSD.

In some advanced settings where tolerances for potential impacts resulting from exploited software vulnerabilities are intensely low, Kubernetes (userspace software) on HardenedBSD is choice for mission.

Like with the other two systems, those running Kubernetes userspace on them are self-sufficient and are not among the audience of external more general Kubernetes distro support channels.

If you happen to like RKE, check out https://Talos.dev which is the best Kubernetes on Linux distro (for most Kubernetes on Linux use cases).

_

@nijave

Nomad and Kubernetes schedule containers, which are rarely not Linux containers, yeah.

Both can schedule processes in FreeBSD's BSD Jails.

If someone wants to start an open Kubernetes on FreeBSD/HardenedBSD project I would encourage that. Personally I would like to see an open Kubernetes on illumos project.

As far as I know where Kubernetes on HardenedBSD runs is not interested in open projects.

Obviously not.
FreeBSD is quietly prevalent in commercial and governen settings. NetApp, for one example, there are many others.

Separate from any of those, a good chunk of America's more sensitive production database clusters, other workloads, and some network applications are scheduled by Nomad or Kubernetes running directly on a kernel that is not Linux.

The most popular kernel is not necessarily appropriate for all use cases or types of environments where high-value targets reside.

Directly downstream of FreeBSD, HardenedBSD achieved its long history of invulnerability to what were exploitable vulnerabilities in upstream through its advancements in the operating system layer.

  https://hardenedbsd.org/content/easy-feature-comparison
_

> but security thru obscurity

Arrogance is stupidity.

CiCD of Gentoo based systems patched this as early as any other system.

I am hoping to see an indication that https://grsecurity.net/ patches preemptively mitigated CVE-2026-98432 but I'm feeling less optimistic.

This vulnerability has been a stark reminder to why in some places things are running on HardenedBSD instead of Linux.

Re:Byesky: Wipe your Bluesky account clean on Monday November 02, 2026 @02:17PM (#50342090)
There are some people, particularly in the Minneopolis area, who really need exactly this tool.
Keep developing apps in Javascript and Typescript instead of bug-unfriendly ReScript.

  https://rescript-lang.org/
Re:My Favourite Laptop on Monday November 02, 2026 @01:29PM (#50341313)
I look forward to when these 5th-generation Intel chipsets are "jail broken" and the totality of device functionality is accessible with a management engine binary compiled from purely open source code.
The notion that SimpleX has the effect of keeping users anonymous where the SMP servers under the domain simplex.im are used, is a total scam.

A SQL query would defeat the purported anonymity in many cases. An ai model would look at the other cases where IPs of VPNs or Tor are used, uncover much, and yawn.

Now another set of servers are operated by Flux. That helps. But you know how BFFs are with each other, inter-team access to data sinks.

These posts on Reddit and this orange reddit over here by maqp are high quality. They should be read thoroughly.

On the other side of this, the ability to change the receiving server with zero-interaction by remote contacts does lay a cornerstone for effectively anonymizing users. The option to add additional servers used by a SimpleX profile is another cornerstone.

But the mainline user interface hasn't been updated to use these effectively.

What I do like about SimpleX is it is, with a massive asterisk, distributed. SimpleX in practice lives somewhere between decentralized and distributed right now. SimpleX as used by the unwashed masses and disregarding everyone else, is decentralized, or quasi-decentralized.

SimpleX is not confined to a centralized permissioned namespace like Signal 501c3's service which is total vendor lock-in, for fools (yes if you are using that service, you have been had).

SimpleX has shirked the manual processes that XMPP+OMEMO users need to proactively do for a distributed experience.

The audited core Haskell code is hard to argue with. Looking forward to a successor in Lean.

But today, both SimpleX and the better XMPP clients are best enjoyed with community-managed container compose files.

I have read in places apparently originated from more than two minds some zero knowledge approaches that do functionally mitigate any usable identifiers, sans where users are of a small crowd and rarely ever change source IPs, so as much as may ever be practicable with current generations of IP (Reticulum with no source addresses looking better and better). Will be cool to see these implemented.

There may also be a way to do multiple redundant server paths that may be more efficient.

Much waiting to be done, things simply throwing an LLM at won't achieve.

I am convinced by the behavior of some degenerates that one of among those things is not a polished iOS app. iOS is a total cancer. iOS, for which no source code is available outside of Apple and its puppeteers, is for slaves. Voluntarily use of iOS, is an explicit admission cybersecurity-illiteracy.

Re:Understanding Email Encryption (2025) on Monday November 02, 2026 @11:07AM (#50338838)

  August 2023

  To defend against this risk, Chrome contains a pin set for all Google properties, and we only consider an HTTPS input trustworthy if it’s authenticated using a key in this pin set. Chrome contains a pin set for all Google properties, and we only consider an HTTPS input trustworthy if it’s authenticated using a key in this pin set. This protects against malicious certificate issuance by third parties.

  https://security.googleblog.com/2023/08/making-chrome-more-secure-by-bringing.html
is the most recent first-source writing a cursory search just found, consistent with pinsets in transport_security_state_static_pins.json

  $ grep -n mail src/net/http/transport_security_state_static_pins.json 
  170:       "name": "gmail.com",
  185:       "name": "googlemail.com",
  230:       "name": "www.gmail.com",
  235:       "name": "www.googlemail.com",
  1500:      "name": "gmail.co.ug",

  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/refs/heads/main/net/http/transport_security_state_static_pins.json
If Google were to ever abdicate their position such that Chromium or Android let a non-Google CA deem a national treasure like mail.google.com valid, especially by some rando chud CA from some third world shithole, oh how crushingly disappointing that would be, a dagger to USA's greatness.

_

If HKP specification had worked out (RIP, lol), that may have over the last decade-ish spared some config lines for CA config behind commands like

  browser_organizationFoo.sh
  browser_organizationBar.sh
to load browsers with whitelisted CA in Firejail, Capsicum (BSD Jails), or kvm/bhyve/xen/SwiftBoot/whatever.

It's odd how that, for the unwashed masses' use of browsers with the default CA config, high-value clearnet websites' PKI robustness is, from all I've read over the years, more often than not functionally outperformed by prominent LSD/tryptamine vendors of various DarkNet Markets.

  LoL
_

A more meaningful answer on the "other organizations" question above, for a project one might get one or more CA and relevant details in a PGP/MIME or S/MIME or by-hand gpg/sq message with the implicit "you already know what to do".

Some commercially operated services, geared more towards high-value customers, have casually offered a first-party CA cert, perhaps due to being operated by and for relatively higher value demographic (thus, I'll not advertise them here), even at general or low pricing (high trust societies just hit different).

Some "far left" or whatever anarchist-ish communities often not chasing profit casually do first-party CA too, which is no less based than any other subculture doing it.

Any time someone may have ever manually sent you a VPN config file to load, this is in essence sort of what they were doing but without the existing known-pubkey part.

Across the globe, competent IT teams transparently propagate dedicated browser instance profiles with explicitly whitelisted CA that show up in users' toolbar/dock as differently styled icons with appropriate splash images/dialogue when clicked.

The ability to do this correctly and without mistakes, is, as mentioned above, a litmus test for (when asked to do so) if an IT team is legit or not.

This functional pattern of the people who get the real shit done has been in place for more than, as far as I personally for over two decades have happened to know. And, functionally in its substance, no matter what form on the surface, it's not going away, not ever.

At least not until a cosmic event leading to the dissolution of this current run of civilization.

As I imagine, you already probably know. I see your pubkeys on Keybase. Imported.

Re:Understanding Email Encryption (2025) on Monday November 02, 2026 @03:11AM (#50334266)
Google Mail's $5/seat offering is the first one that comes to mind.

  04 May 2011
  Starting with Chrome 13, we'll have HTTPS pins for most Google properties. This means that certificate chains for, say, https://www.google.com, must include a whitelisted public key. It's a fatal error otherwise. 

  https://www.imperialviolet.org/2011/05/04/pinning.html
ImperialViolet is Adam Langley’s personal technical blog. Langley worked at Google on HTTPS infrastructure and Chrome’s SSL stack.

A Tauri app, which is essentially a Chromium browser instance with no address bar and widgets to access browser settings, a Fastmail desktop "app" made with Tauri can potentially even the playing field between Google the Goliath and Fastmail the David on the TLS certificate pinning front. Tauri is like Electron but sucks a lot less.

  https://tauri.app/
_

> if you've spending tens of thousands of dollars per month

Such as, 8,000 users at $40k/month for Google Mail.

Yubico has great volume discounts for a part of the CapEx side of a sane deployment of this.

The basic WebAuthn/FIDO2-only Yubikeys with a Fastmail logo on them would be, as the kids said a generation ago, "dope".

_

> where they have a Helpdesk

Quality attention to cicd and artifact release may avoid and potentially reduce conventional helpdesk activity.

For individual users of SaaS, provided the .dmg or .msi of the downstream Betterbird/Thunderbird (or other MUA) has sound cicd and decent release attention, no more additional support tickets than reasonable should occur beyond an initial phase.

A downstream MUA distro can eliminate manual configuration and superfluous details, such as the shit experience with Thunderbird on macOS (Thunderbird's fault 100%) with Oath2 I saw in the last few months. Such a distro could be tuned with a slew of relatively small adjustments reducing existing support ticket traffic.

Startups with headcount of 20 to 30, a good chunk of that being developers, where I have historically preferred to dwell, helpdesk is not there nor wanted for. Higher quality customers are here.

_

> and golden image deploys

Chromebooks, which not including K-12 did outnumber macOS in non-personal environments around a half-decade ago during that Event 201 thing. Super low IT overhead with those.

I have been distant from MIS type of IT for a while but have heard echoes or binocular'd in a bit and believe the golden image era has quietly passed us.

Conventional image pattern shouldn't be necessary anywhere now.

Somewhere in 2019, Apple warped native tooling in tandem with device firmware behavior to squeeze out the conventional image pattern ; killed it off.

Apple Business now includes built-in mobile device management which can enroll and set up Apple devices then apply standard settings and apps through "Blueprints" ; the .dmg would be trivial to push out. The successor to Jamf.

With Microsoft Intune, propagation of .msi packages to enrolled devices is a day-to-day task.

Ubuntu, RedHat, SuSE, Qubes, and all related distros, when under IT teams that can code on a rudimentary level, are managed with Ansible or Salt, without the "enterprise tax" part.

What all of these have in common is centralized org-wide device management where the ability to push out a .msi or .dmg or .deb/.rpm/.AppImage is there.

In similar spirit to certificate pinning, the advanced customers have dedicated private cicd consume source code from the OS vendor.

The more advanced are on

  Bootstrappable builds: how and why
  https://lwn.net/Articles/1088279/
which in tandem with cryptography-grade hashes, has over half way solved the "Trusting Trust" problem that Ken Thompson raised.

_

> what other SaaS consumer products use certificate pinning.

Slack has the low-hanging-fruit opportunity to with their Electron app, but has reportedly dropped the ball. This is great for tech workers who like to divert all Slack contents to a separate local data sink for archiving and discovery and non-shitty data access.

This repo from about seven years ago looks abandoned and inactive, but

  https://github.com/myxious/electron-root-ssl-pinning
was not necessary for anyone who wanted to do it.

_

> let's expand it to banks and government departments in most countries.

With the episodic exposure I had with computer vision -> flow chart startups in the SF Bay Area many years ago, relatively ongoing time sinks with some archetypal MBA twat types, and some perceived legendary tier banks running on one of the two legit clouds (neither of which is that Azure garbage), who then fell on customer-facing downtime by not deploying with rudimentary cloud patterns that startups don't fail to do (as we recently found out), I am left feeling not confident that banks can do IT with self-reliance these days.

They can still push out .msi and group policy objects though, for sure.

From anecdotes I hear of and distant observations of state governments, departments of the big federal government sans some of the cooler TLA, and govs in Europe, I am not optimistic about those.

About a decade and a half ago we used to look at these two types of institutions and go "ah, the big guys, in their big buildings, they broker a thing I need, with their marble floors and reassuring smiles, these egregore have got it all figured out".

As a staff level DevOps / DevSecOps / whatever who has been along for the ride with a share of Silicon Valley culture-OS startups with enterprise customers, closely followed practices and white papers of hyperscalers and elite security firms, thus can see through any IT product/pattern transparently for its base principles...

-- having witnessed various sitcoms, heard of or read over 9,000 of first-hand accounts of such sitcoms, on top of the broadly spread cultural decay we are experiencing in the West upcoming on this Fourth Turning, with the rot of these institutions, and the major cultural shifts on computer illiteracy/obliviousness being normalized among "professionals" observed over the last couple of decades, I think more often than not some scrutiny of IT patterns at these institutions uncovers that they are severely retarded.

I suspect on the mid to lower end of the gov side it's just checkboxes, misdirection, and casual corruption almost all of the way down. Anyone who actually gives a shit about IT security and tries to fix things gets railroaded out.

The subcontractors who pick up the slack and handle real shit, like SpaceX is something NASA is dependent on (macro example), the upper echelon of the private sector, supranational organizations run by elite characters, are where not the progressive-minded IT teams are found but where IT is treated with some seriousness by leadership. But no transparency into IT patterns will be offered by these outside of talks at cool parties like DEF CON and AWS Re:Invent (shitty DJs but still a great party).

Re:Understanding Email Encryption (2025) on Sunday November 01, 2026 @09:56PM (#50332613)

  https://nix64.live/hn-fastmail-comment-b9cf004de71eece0f460f3bae3620e3f52a51b627e674877f2b2eb537aa0c935d018e04dcc9a4f7416480abb2bfb4d7a80ebc264d717db9abf325d200592767b.txt.asc
edit:

I didn't realize I was replying to the CEO of Fastmail until I had written the entire comment. In retrospect I'm glad I wrote without any filter.

I have generally thought Fastmail is a pretty cool guy, eh serves email without frills and doesn't afraid of anything.

So by association my working assumption is the CEO is too.

edit 2:

okay apparently the open source channel of Cyrus IMAP, which I used relatively tangentially at an ancient time, still doesn't have the same configuration flexibility as Dovecot (thanks ChatGPT..). A whole 'nother config file and K8s/init/whatever service entry becomes necessary for another TLS listener, boo hoo I guess.

edit 3:

embedded sha512 hash of comment in file name so no one can say I mutated the file after the edit window is closed.

Does this mean that as a customer I can select only nurses that don't have fake degrees?
Signal has reproducible builds for Signal Android.

Maybe some of Android users who are naive enough to use Google Play to manage a package like Signal could over time consistently inspect what APK they have and share results.

  https://developers.google.com/android/binary_transparency/google_apk/verification_details
But reproducible builds for Signal Desktop are "experimental" and "may not work on the public releases yet", which in real terms means Signal Desktop doesn't actually have reproducible builds yet.

Maybe reproducible builds of apps for iOS and macOS will happen some day but the people with the necessary competencies to do reproducible builds are unlikely to believe in others using those systems enough to attempt reproducible builds for them.

Even with reproducible builds, whether packages on iOS can be verified seems to be a grey area at best and with no source code for iOS there is no starting point to believe anything iOS tells us.

SimpleX has been inconsistent with integrity of releases. Some releases have the expected GPG signatures but more do not.

For any release to not have at least one GPG signature on the source tarball is a serious concern.

Evgeny, the head of the SimpleX project, is doing much better with Git commits now than he has in the past. But a cursory look at the Git commit history at the link below shows an RSA4096 key that is over three years old.

    https://github.com/simplex-chat/simplex-chat/commits/stable/
What many would like to see from the SimpleX project are a combination of signatures on release source tarballs with RSA, ECC, and PQ keys where at least two of those are on hardware wallets.

I know there are some have urged Evgeny to use hardware wallets for signing source tarball releases and to be forthcoming that he is using a hardware wallet (something built into a Macbook is not sufficient) but there isn't anything on the SimpleX blog showing this.

  https://simplex.chat/blog/
_

> users who can't have any freedom unless they compile their own builds

Those who don't have cicd don't have any freedom and have questionable security at best. Whether this is how things should be, I'll let others argue that. It's how it is.

Re:Understanding Email Encryption (2025) on Sunday November 01, 2026 @12:40PM (#50327784)
If Fastmail offered a CA certificate, then whenever I use Fastmail I would run another separate browser instance or mail client with all CA certs removed and Fastmail's CA certificate loaded.

This behavior, or lack of it, and resulting functionality is what differentiates the "follow the best practices consensus" security teams and the upper tiers of security teams.

The service operated by the incorporated 501c3 has full visibility into who else a user messages and when. This is not good for privacy.

What the non-low-value users are generally looking for is the option to not opt-in to discard anonymity with any potentially involved third parties such as server operators and network operators, and left at the discretion of the users solely.

Other systems have already solved this. One user can be not anonymous while another can choose to not opt-in to not be anonymous.

The users still know who the user on the other side is.

Anyone who has worked with SQL databases and graph databases can't buy this goofy "camouflage" idea.

If you don't know how computers work, yeah it sounds great. But those who do know how computers work see it for what it really is: a bucket of shit.

>> I don't think this is what Moxie wanted.

> I think this is exactly what he wanted

You think, users should be required to carry a cell phone or make use of a debit card or credit card, in order to message another user, is exactly, what Matthew wanted?

A self-described anarchist who described the original cypherpunks as his teenage heroes?

When XMPP+OTR had already been, among competent people, the prevalent norm for over half a decade when he gave that DEF CON 18 talk?

That is just crazy, man.

In that DEF CON 18 talk, Moxie talked about scope of choice and how the scope of choice changed to "do I want to carry a cell phone, or not?". A notion that Matthew's dream was to impose on the world a demand to carry a cell phone or a debit/credit card transaction on others, such a tax, to enjoy what he and his friends and colleagues already on top of pure Internet Protocol, is on its face absurd.

_

> Spam is not a plague because registration remains expensive

The issue of spam is fully mitigated with an invite token, a 16 byte string ; "is", not "can be", because other systems in production have already been doing this.

The way it works is simple. If Alice wants to receive a message from Bob, Alice can share a connection string username+token to Bob. Then Bob can message Alice and for that time not other users of the hosted centralized namespace.

Very simple concept.

Simple enough for a mediocre dev to implement without an LLM.

The spectre of spam does not justify the demand for "checking in" with your local PSTN tower, nor the friction involved with an uninvolved and unwanted third party named Google (love Google overall but this is such a bastardly and disgusting concept), nor does it justify demanding a debit/credit card transaction become involved.

The spectre of spam does not justify any of this horse shit.

"Hey Bob, here is my username to message me, provided you subject yourself to this horse shit", where such horse shit antithetical in a fundamental way to the values espoused founder of Signal.

The new, grossly degenerated Scope of Choice.

Perhaps some who call themselves "hackers" or software developers may have been actually fooled by this false spectre of spam. I was never among them.

Even worse, the phone numbers, Google Play accounts, debit cards and credit cards, these are cheap. Among the scammer underworld these are a plenty and fungible.

An invite token personally sent by Alice or read aloud by Alice to Bob, is not.

But if somebody wants to harass a specific user on Signal, that's relatively cheap to do.

_

> Not to mention that sending ongoing traffic to your own server tells everyone where and when you're posting

Uncle Jeff, AWS, who doesn't tell exactly everyone but a lot of people, not excluding ICE at any given time, knows when you are posting, from where, and to what other users. The last of which is specifically obviated by a separate namespace hosted on a separate server.

On the occasions I have run Signal's server software, I and other users did mitigate these concerns. We do appreciate that others also have these means, or not.

Another messaging system, you may have already read its name actually, has already solved these problems in a way that they are successfully mitigated in a wholly transparent way for casual users.

_

> Alternative servers are not sapping user metrics.

This imperative is not the users' problem and runs counter to the best interests of the users.

_

> Its tradeoffs all the way down.

Right. In Matthew's view, the horse shit is a tradeoff.

I believe there are other tradeoffs available that are ethical, not more ethical, but ethical, and carry much less technical complexity.

The incorporated 501c3 named Signal is, in IT terms, a vendor. Is it not?

The Signal client software is open source and some of the clients have reproducible builds. The Signal server software is open source, though has a history of being over a year out of date at some points. Other deployments of this server software for production use are rare.

Suppose you configured an instance of the Signal server software and others you know ran also a somewhat modified Signal client that could access that instance of the Signal server software.

But the centralized namespace of the hosted Signal service hosted by the incorporated 501c3 named Signal would not be accessible through that server instance now would it.

And, as dictated by the incorporated vendor of the centralized namespace, and other reasons, in practice, this client would have to run as a separate piece of software. "Another app".

This is vendor lock-in.

The service hosted by the 501c3 named Signal seems widely open yet is a permissioned namespace. A physical location tracking number aka phone number or a credit/debit card is required to access the namespace. This is for slaves. The profane.

  Open Signal on your phone to keep your account active
This vendor is abusive.

And, I don't think this is what Moxie wanted.

Signal 501c3 is a centralized service. XMPP and Matrix are decentralized/federated. SimpleX is distributed.

Re:If IPv4 Were Land on Friday October 30, 2026 @07:30PM (#50311503)
Yeah I had later noticed that too. Much of the US companies do end up resolving to IPv6.

100% of the aforementioned US gov domains resolve to IPv6.

More 5G networks than not are using IPv6 and 464xlat. Many ISPs are IPv6 only too so closer to half the time than not there are IPv6 packets to reach to those IPv4 addresses.

  $   for  USCompany  in    apple akamai att berkshire bestbuy boeing bofa burgerking cnn chase chevron citi comcast costco cvs dell disney fedex fidelity gatorade google goldmansachs gopro hellofresh hilton homedepot infowars in-n-out jcpenny johnsonandjohnson kaiser kroger lulumon macys mcdonalds microsoft nike pepsi petco radioshack safeway shell southwest sprouts statefarm tacobell target tesla traderjoes ups usbank uschamber walgreens walmart wellsfargo wholefoods yahoo    aquantuo atlanticseafarms beehivemeals beetlesplumbing dynamicautomotive jamies-farm joeandbella jovyco privacy4cars prosperityehr redroostercoffee resortlifecarts sproutlabs tradedesignbuild 
    do
      echo ${USCompany}
      dig +short aaaa www.${USCompany}.com
      echo  ; done
  apple
  www-apple-com.v.aaplimg.com.
  www.apple.com.edgekey.net.
  e6858.dsce9.akamaiedge.net.
  2600:1406:3a00:493::1aca
  2600:1406:3a00:492::1aca
  2600:1406:3a00:494::1aca
  2600:1406:3a00:486::1aca
  2600:1406:3a00:48a::1aca
  
  akamai
  www.akamai.com.edgekey.net.
  2600:1406:2e00:49::172e:d8cf
  2600:1406:2e00:49::172e:d8c6
  
  att
  prod-www.zr-att.com.akadns.net.
  cac2.m.att.com.edgekey.net.
  e11697.cd.akamaiedge.net.
  
  berkshire
  3tfzq88u2cbx.wpeproxy.com.
  
  bestbuy
  www.bestbuy.com.edgekey.net.
  e5816.x.akamaiedge.net.
  
  boeing
  d1pt7e7bvjlgwo.cloudfront.net.
  2600:9000:24bc:7a00:16:a4e1:f600:93a1
  2600:9000:24bc:3600:16:a4e1:f600:93a1
  2600:9000:24bc:b400:16:a4e1:f600:93a1
  2600:9000:24bc:e000:16:a4e1:f600:93a1
  2600:9000:24bc:6e00:16:a4e1:f600:93a1
  2600:9000:24bc:be00:16:a4e1:f600:93a1
  2600:9000:24bc:fc00:16:a4e1:f600:93a1
  2600:9000:24bc:c000:16:a4e1:f600:93a1
  
  bofa
  redirect.ecglb.bac.com.
  
  burgerking
  prod-bk-us-web.com.rbi.tools.
  
  cnn
  cnn-tls.map.fastly.net.
  2a04:4e42:200::773
  2a04:4e42:400::773
  2a04:4e42:600::773
  2a04:4e42::773
  
  chase
  gtm.www.chase.com.akadns.net.
  www.chase.com.edgekey.net.
  e129412.a.akamaiedge.net.
  
  chevron
  www-afd-b9aycqabggbkcsdt.z01.azurefd.net.
  mr-z01.tm-azurefd.net.
  2603:1061:14:95::1
  
  citi
  san.www.citi.com.edgekey.net.
  e16976.x.akamaiedge.net.
  
  comcast
  www.comcast.com.edgekey.net.
  e523.dscb.akamaiedge.net.
  2600:1406:3a00:482::20b
  2600:1406:3a00:48d::20b
  
  costco
  costco.map.fastly.net.
  
  cvs
  www.cvs.edgekey.net.
  e5769.x.akamaiedge.net.
  
  dell
  www1.dell-cidr.akadns.net.
  cdn-www.dell.com-v2.edgekey.net.
  e13665.x.akamaiedge.net.
  
  disney
  www-cdn.matterhorn.app.
  
  fedex
  www.fedex.com.akadns.net.
  cidr.fedex.com.akadns.net.
  ipv6www.fedex.com.edgekey.net.
  e111296.dsca.akamaiedge.net.
  2600:1406:2e00:49::172e:d8cc
  2600:1406:2e00:49::172e:d8c8
  2600:1406:2e00:49::172e:d8d0
  2600:1406:2e00:49::172e:d8ca
  2600:1406:2e00:49::172e:d8c4
  
  fidelity
  www.fidelity.com.edgekey.net.
  e94446.x.akamaiedge.net.
  
  gatorade
  2606:4700:4409::ac40:9261
  2a06:98c1:3105::6812:299f
  
  google
  2001:4860:482d:7700::
  2001:4860:482a:7700::
  2001:4860:4828:7700::
  2001:4860:4827:7700::
  2001:4860:482c:7700::
  2001:4860:4826:7700::
  2001:4860:4829:7700::
  2001:4860:482b:7700::
  
  goldmansachs
  www.gs.com.
  www.gs.com.edgekey.net.
  e17133.x.akamaiedge.net.
  
  gopro
  d1h7n50c10z72v.cloudfront.net.
  2600:9000:201e:6800:17:765c:a5c0:93a1
  2600:9000:201e:4c00:17:765c:a5c0:93a1
  2600:9000:201e:a200:17:765c:a5c0:93a1
  2600:9000:201e:2400:17:765c:a5c0:93a1
  2600:9000:201e:a800:17:765c:a5c0:93a1
  2600:9000:201e:fe00:17:765c:a5c0:93a1
  2600:9000:201e:ca00:17:765c:a5c0:93a1
  2600:9000:201e:c200:17:765c:a5c0:93a1
  
  hellofresh
  www.hellofresh.com.cdn.cloudflare.net.
  2606:4700:4409::6812:209d
  2a06:98c1:3106::ac40:9b63
  
  hilton
  www.hilton.com.edgekey.net.
  e2904.dscx.akamaiedge.net.
  2600:1406:2e00:49a::b58
  2600:1406:2e00:4a3::b58
  
  homedepot
  www.homedepot.com.edgekey.net.
  e301254.x.akamaiedge.net.
  
  infowars
  2606:4700:10::6814:1a60
  2606:4700:10::ac42:9d27
  
  in-n-out
  sw6cs.x.incapdns.net.
  
  jcpenny
  www.jcpenny.com.edgesuite.net.
  a1441.b.akamai.net.
  
  johnsonandjohnson
  prod.jnj.psdops.com.
  
  kaiser
  kaiser.com.
  2001:1ab0:7e1e:151::58
  
  kroger
  www.kroger.com.edgekey.net.
  e8023.a.akamaiedge.net.
  
  lulumon
  lulumon.com.
  
  macys
  www.macys.com.edgekey.net.
  e5791.a.akamaiedge.net.
  
  mcdonalds
  direct-san.mcdonalds.com.edgekey.net.
  e179224.a.akamaiedge.net.
  
  microsoft
  www.microsoft.com-c-3.edgekey.net.
  e13678.dscb.akamaiedge.net.
  2600:1406:3a00:487::356e
  2600:1406:3a00:486::356e
  2600:1406:3a00:497::356e
  2600:1406:3a00:481::356e
  2600:1406:3a00:482::356e
  
  nike
  www.nike.com-v1.edgekey.net.
  e2785.x.akamaiedge.net.
  
  pepsi
  g2wh497.x.incapdns.net.
  
  petco
  2a06:98c1:3108::6812:20c7
  2a06:98c1:310a::ac40:9b39
  
  radioshack
  prod.magentocloud.map.fastly.net.
  2a04:4e42::380
  2a04:4e42:200::380
  2a04:4e42:400::380
  2a04:4e42:600::380
  
  safeway
  htu5x69.x.incapdns.net.
  
  shell
  www.nic.shell.edgekey.net.
  e200089.dscb.akamaiedge.net.
  2600:1406:3a00:33::170b:cfef
  2600:1406:3a00:33::170b:cfe6
  
  southwest
  www.southwest.com.edgekey.net.
  e7466.a.akamaiedge.net.
  
  sprouts
  2606:4700:10::ac42:9705
  2606:4700:10::6814:2445
  
  statefarm
  statefarm.edgekey.net.
  e124943.a.akamaiedge.net.
  
  tacobell
  www.tacobell-prod.com.edgekey.net.
  e78335.b.akamaiedge.net.
  
  target
  sites.target.map.fastly.net.
  
  tesla
  www.tesla.com.edgekey.net.
  e1792.dscx.akamaiedge.net.
  2600:1406:3a00:291::700
  2600:1406:3a00:280::700
  2600:1406:3a00:293::700
  2600:1406:3a00:290::700
  2600:1406:3a00:296::700
  
  traderjoes
  www.traderjoes.com.edgekey.net.
  e4528.b.akamaiedge.net.
  
  ups
  ev.ups.com.akadns.net.
  ev2b.ups.com.edgekey.net.
  e13626.dsca.akamaiedge.net.
  2600:1406:2e00:986::353a
  2600:1406:2e00:98b::353a
  2600:1406:2e00:983::353a
  2600:1406:2e00:984::353a
  
  usbank
  www.usbank.com.edgekey.net.
  e374753.a.akamaiedge.net.
  
  uschamber
  uschamber.map.fastly.net.
  
  walgreens
  walgreens.com.edgekey.net.
  e36070.dsca.akamaiedge.net.
  2600:1406:2e00:20::45c0:8be8
  2600:1406:2e00:20::45c0:8bda
  
  walmart
  www.walmart.com.cdn-wal.net.
  
  wellsfargo
  www.wellsfargo.com.edgekey.net.
  e82164.b.akamaiedge.net.
  
  wholefoods
  2600:9000:25ef:c800:8:df9e:eb80:93a1
  2600:9000:25ef:e000:8:df9e:eb80:93a1
  2600:9000:25ef:7400:8:df9e:eb80:93a1
  2600:9000:25ef:6400:8:df9e:eb80:93a1
  2600:9000:25ef:ca00:8:df9e:eb80:93a1
  2600:9000:25ef:9e00:8:df9e:eb80:93a1
  2600:9000:25ef:5400:8:df9e:eb80:93a1
  2600:9000:25ef:fa00:8:df9e:eb80:93a1
  
  yahoo
  me-ycpi-cf-www.g06.yahoodns.net.
  2001:4998:18:800::4003
  2001:4998:18:800::4002
  
  aquantuo
  2606:4700:20::681a:2e
  2606:4700:20::681a:12e
  2606:4700:20::ac43:4547
  
  atlanticseafarms
  2606:4700:3033::6815:4581
  2606:4700:3035::ac43:d0b4
  
  beehivemeals
  beehivemeals.myshopify.com.
  shops.myshopify.com.
  2620:127:f00f:e::
  
  beetlesplumbing
  s.multiscreensite.com.
  global.multiscreensite.com.
  a3c02b2530d6f27ca.awsglobalaccelerator.com.
  
  dynamicautomotive
  dynamicautomotive.com.
  
  jamies-farm
  shops.myshopify.com.
  2620:127:f00f:e::
  
  joeandbella
  joebella.myshopify.com.
  shops.myshopify.com.
  2620:127:f00f:e::
  
  jovyco
  jovy-brand.myshopify.com.
  shops.myshopify.com.
  2620:127:f00f:e::
  
  privacy4cars
  2606:4700:20::681a:dca
  2606:4700:20::ac43:4af6
  2606:4700:20::681a:cca
  
  prosperityehr
  2606:4700:10::6814:2f68
  2606:4700:10::ac42:94bd
  
  redroostercoffee
  cname.vercel-dns.com.
  
  resortlifecarts
  sprod-dnn-gce6a8hab5g5bkf6.a03.azurefd.net.
  mr-a03.tm-azurefd.net.
  2603:1061:14:99::1
  
  sproutlabs
  cdn.webflow.com.
  2620:cb:2000::1
  
  tradedesignbuild
  ext-sq.squarespace.com.



  $   for  USent  in    cia congress dhs epa ice fbi fcc nasa nsa whitehouse
    do
      echo ${USent}
      dig +short aaaa www.${USent}.gov
      echo  ; done
  cia
  cia.gov.edgekey.net.
  e10004744.dsca.akamaiedge.net.
  2600:1406:3a00:33::170b:cfeb
  2600:1406:3a00:33::170b:cff2
  
  congress
  2606:4700:4402::ac40:90ce
  2a06:98c1:3109::6812:2b32
  
  dhs
  www.dhs.gov.edgekey.net.
  e6485.dsca.akamaiedge.net.
  2600:1406:2e00:98b::1955
  2600:1406:2e00:983::1955
  
  epa
  d32i4z0dxazdtp.cloudfront.net.
  2600:9000:201e:a600:10:f3db:af40:93a1
  2600:9000:201e:f400:10:f3db:af40:93a1
  2600:9000:201e:6000:10:f3db:af40:93a1
  2600:9000:201e:c400:10:f3db:af40:93a1
  2600:9000:201e:b600:10:f3db:af40:93a1
  2600:9000:201e:d200:10:f3db:af40:93a1
  2600:9000:201e:d600:10:f3db:af40:93a1
  2600:9000:201e:6400:10:f3db:af40:93a1
  
  ice
  www.ice.gov.edgekey.net.
  e6485.dsca.akamaiedge.net.
  2600:1406:2e00:98b::1955
  2600:1406:2e00:983::1955
  
  fbi
  www.fbi.gov.cdn.cloudflare.net.
  2606:4700::6810:94f4
  2606:4700::6810:95f4
  
  fcc
  www.fcc.gov.edgekey.net.
  e4909.dscb.akamaiedge.net.
  2600:1406:3a00:484::132d
  2600:1406:3a00:497::132d
  
  nasa
  nasa-gov.go-vip.net.
  2a04:fa87:fffd::c000:426c
  
  nsa
  nsa.gov.edgekey.net.
  e16248.dscb.akamaiedge.net.
  2600:1406:3a00:487::3f78
  2600:1406:3a00:496::3f78
  
  whitehouse
  wh47.go-vip.net.
  2a04:fa87:fffd::c000:4233
Re:My favourite PowerMac is a Nintendo Wii on Friday October 30, 2026 @05:07PM (#50310150)
Nintendo Wii have made for neat zero knowledge Nostr relays, mesh-net (CJDNS) routers, and other makeshift "underground" infrastructure.

USB hubs, USB SATA adapters and USB Ethernet interfaces for the win.

Re:Breaking the Open Web Won't Stop the Bad Bots on Friday October 30, 2026 @04:13PM (#50309521)
The "you need to enable cookies to view this site", cookies that will be limited to a browser-container and will be thrown away when the browser is closed anyway, is a sign that this modern nu web is broken in a fundamental way.
Re:Breaking the Open Web Won't Stop the Bad Bots on Friday October 30, 2026 @03:57PM (#50309338)
> They can't "async" their way out of that work.

Sharing cookies along a strata of inter-team bots is one trick.

_

Web scraping is (among the other pieces) also for the more technically inclined among the "little people" to have computers do things that people they don't have the money to hire might do. Making web scraping more difficult, which won't stop the big players who will work around the hurdles one way or another, is "pulling up the ladder".

_

> What alternative web could change this state of things?

A different architecture for trafficking web contents, one that doesn't need the "shield" of something like Cloudflare or "tar pit" of something like Anubis in the first place.

IPFS is or is something like one piece of that picture but there are other essential pieces to complete that picture.

  Federal Cyber Experts Thought Microsoft’s Cloud Was “a Pile of Shit.” They Approved It Anyway.

  https://www.propublica.org/article/microsoft-cloud-fedramp-cybersecurity-government
Re:We Won't "Just Hang Out" on Friday October 30, 2026 @02:44PM (#50308380)
The status thing really got turned on it head around late 2015 when more GetThingsDone oriented groups detected that Facebook was actively engineering social consensus through orchestrated shadowbanning.

The prigs are oh so high status .. to other prigs.

Re:Breaking the Open Web Won't Stop the Bad Bots on Friday October 30, 2026 @01:58PM (#50307740)
Any bot is operating on behalf of one or more humans somewhere. Bots are good, for the most part.

The conventional way of doing web isn't efficient. If it were, no one would be complaining about bots. The way we do web is the thing that needs to be updated.

Feels. AKA stupidity, ultimately.
Re:How Do You Take a Picture of a Black Hole? on Friday October 30, 2026 @09:35AM (#50303676)
They got an image of something, yeah.

Or, did they?

  "So we had been perfecting these imaging algorithms on synthetic data. We’d fed these algorithms made-up data. So we would take a black hole image that we might be looking at. We’d corrupt it with noise, and we’d send it through these algorithms, and we’d refine these to the point where we were pretty confident in these algorithms."
Algorithms? For what? So they're not just taking a photo of something observed through a telescope.

They're not really explaining this either.

I'm trying to keep an open mind but I'm still not buying the whole black hole thing.

There needs to be something more intellectually compelling than "we know it's a black hole because we know it's a black hole".

Yes, you read that right. I am doubting this religion.

  "That was a moment where there was a lot of crying and screaming."
another odd quote from this article, provided one is assuming this is supposed to be around the scientific method.
Re:If IPv4 Were Land on Friday October 30, 2026 @05:17AM (#50301482)

  user@host:~$ dig +short  aaaa  www.citi.com
  san.www.citi.com.edgekey.net.
  e16976.x.akamaiedge.net.

  user@host:~$ dig +short  aaaa  www.walmart.com
  www.walmart.com.cdn-wal.net.
You should run the commands yourself, not your end users. Obvio.

Older »