johnnypangs

I agree that meaning is something one has to self-impose, but there is also meaning in the creation of art. I don’t find that same meaning in work that accomplishes the goal of making an employer money in the same way I’d incorporate meaning into a short story I’d write.

I think what I’m trying to say is that there are both ways to create art by coding and ways to just make a product for consumption. And I think using AI for said products doesn’t really reduce the meaning of said work.

I think I gave brainfuck as an example because it seems there was a meaning behind it beyond being profitable. The writer had something to say. Does writing something like brainfuck with AI take away its meaning? I’d personally say yes, but that’s an interpretation.

I agree, is the 100th rest api I’ve made for my 5th employer art? I don’t think so. It’s just a way to (maybe) make my employer money.

I’d say the brainfuck language on the other hand is art. Hard to draw a fine line as to which is which.

I can say most if not all the projects I’ve ever made land in the former. I’ve made some clever solutions but nothing approaching something with meaning.

Good on you for doing this and I hope you get promoted. But I can imagine a lot of people are like me and just don’t want to engage in office politics on or offline. Not that I don’t sometimes, but I’d much rather just work and be paid to do a job and live my life.

I have a far less sensationalist headline for this which is:

Two programs that save their cache in the same folder causes issues.

But you still have to share the undodir for both vim and neovim right? If your undo data was that precious why would you gamble the interoperability? You could just have them in different folders and it would be fine.

So the case is, you really need you undo history and want to try out neovim so you just copy paste you vimrc to the new place and accidentally delete your data? I don’t think it’s that bad personally. It’s bound to happen but it’s not automatic.

Do you have a link to how this happened? From what I understand you’d have to point the undodir at the same place as vim for this to happen? It’s not this way by default and you have to put a copy of the exact same thing in your neovim vimrc right without understanding that it would do this?

Even this site on mobile has issues with unnecessary horizontal scroll.

To be fair to the pnpm maintainers, they have been working on this well before the bun AI rewrite. The first commit in their rust experiment is in 2021.

https://github.com/pnpm/pn/commits/main/?after=e24c0b293f1f4...

Here is some more technical information on how this was trained, as well as a download link.

https://huggingface.co/thomsonreuters/Thomson-1.0-Small

(Full disclosure I’m a TR employee, although I had nothing to do with making this)

It’s on hugging face, I suppose one could do those themselves?

https://huggingface.co/thomsonreuters/Thomson-1.0-Small

I don’t think people read the article, I didn’t until I saw your comment. The article feels like clickbait tbh.

I think the unusual thing is that it was written in a week. I highly doubt that they read and understood all 1M lines. But if it works and people use it, what does that mean for software? Should we still care about the code that’s written? Should we even look? I’ve always thought so, but maybe I’m just biased.

Good news, you can already pay for it ;)

https://docs.docker.com/dhi/features/#dhi-enterprise-subscri...

Ive always found this explanation helpful for why these are useful:

https://www.joshwcomeau.com/css/custom-css-reset/

It seems to just be a plan at the moment although like you say you can test it out:

https://vite.dev/guide/rolldown.html#how-to-try-rolldown

Nothing is keeping them to this plan other though, I hope they do follow through. That would make the graph on the page misleading in the other direction though as the speed feature would be included in the non plus version.

I want to also say I'm a happy vite user (and the other projects that team makes).

Ehhhhh... what does this mean for the open source versions of all these libs? You could interpret some of the graphs as vite oss isn't getting rolldown. That would be disappointing but still okay.

I’ve used this before, it helps when you format the entire repo and remove the one commit from the history https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/working-with-files/u...

The mini.nvim maintainer is the one who did a lot of the work for pack I believe:

https://github.com/neovim/neovim/pulls?q=is%3Apr+pack+is%3Ac...

Vite is coming along with rsc at least. https://github.com/vitejs/vite-plugin-react/tree/main/packag...

As one of those people who doesn’t really understand llms, does anyone have any recommendations to better my understanding of them?

Seems like there is more context on this that this article misses: https://www.pcgamer.com/software/security/no-16-billion-pass...

Shout out to Better Display, I find it helps with Lo DPI blurriness in general on macOS

https://github.com/waydabber/BetterDisplay

Agreed, I really liked how the site looked. I thought it was really slick and I am blown away by the how easy the author added extra information in a blog post. Nice work!

There’s even radio and Swedish ebooks in “lätt” or easy Swedish. Helped me when I learned:

Easy Swedish radio news: https://www.sverigesradio.se/grupp/22720

Easy Swedish books: https://www.bokus.com/cgi-bin/product_search.cgi?series=L%E4...

I’m a bit confused, if it runs in the client why does it require deno?

I looked a bit into the JavaScript loaded when going to GitHub and my best guess as to what it’s using react for is the copilot chat.

It’s still using turbo rails and doing full ssr reloads. Something very at odds with react router which it’s also loading.

It’s still loading catalyst (their homebrew web component lib) which from what I understand doesn’t seem to offer react bindings. It even loads lit (another web component lib), which I couldn’t find the react bindings for.

If it’s just for the copilot chat I’d still say GitHub is mainly rails based though would love to hear if anyone has any more / better insight.

Doesn’t github use Rails and web components? They definitely gotten more frontend heavy though…

https://github.blog/engineering/architecture-optimization/ho...

Seems like you can add —no-edit and get the same behavior, now I can delete that alias. Thanks again :)

(Edit: typo)

I see, the reason it’s that long complicated alias was that I didn’t want to open up the editor to change the commit every time I updated. “git commit —amend” does that.

I read the rough how it works and it now makes sense. I might give it a try. Thanks!

I guess the crate version is easier to soft reset?