jmurley

Agreed. Lots of papers like this are submitted, but none have been right so far. Is there some reason to trust this one in particular? I'm not sufficiently familiar with this material to evaluate it.

Thanks, but my favorite explanation of decorators is still this stackoverflow answer (see the second answer)

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/739654/understanding-pyth...

I guess the problem is just with calling it revolutionary now, before we wait and see if it actually does cause any drastic change. There have been lots of frameworks that seem promising, only to learn partway in that they are still missing some really key functionality. It's unfortunate to use revolutionary to describe everything that could, someday cause a change.