jerrytsai
Unfortunately, the study just counted accidents and did not look into what kinds of accidents occurred. It would be fantastic to be able to conduct further research.
Belief in the direction of the price can come from examining the financial fundamentals of a company and the perceived value that it may increasingly generate ("fundamental analysis'). Or it can be speculative, where people believe other people will buy (or sell) more based on observed buying/selling activity ("technical analysis").
With Tesla, many investors were using their own version of technical analysis that far surpassed the valuation that a reasonable fundamental analysis would have derived and even derive today. There was and is a mania, much like there has been and there is for many forms of cryptocurrency.
The recently declining price is likely due to a collective perception that Tesla has been overpriced and, due to recent factors, that the fundamentals that justify the pricing for a share will diverge even further from its recent pricing. From a fundamental level, Tesla was unlikely to justify its recent pricing. An irony is that the earlier mania was so intense even today, after such a pronounced plunge from the start of the year, it likely remains seriously overvalued.
And the edge cases FSD can handle will be impaired by the sensors they do (not) install. While they make a good point that sensor fusion can impair comprehension, the removal of radar makes it hard to avoid the edge cases most calamitous.
I'd be happy to help you narrow down a job title / job description that would help you recruit for your role. Email in profile.
Eyemasks are also effective, but (1) you have to tolerate having something on your face and (2) they can get dislodged while you are sleeping, rendering them ineffective.
I suspect most people who read HN weren't around when this movie came out, but I was around then.
There was tremendous hype -- the excitement that this film generated led to lines of people waiting outside movie theaters just to get their chance to see it. People would watch it and then get back into line to watch it again. I remember hearing of people who watched it 15, 20, 25 times.
Star Wars substantially advanced special effects. If you want to get an idea of what the state of special effects were in that era, watch Star Trek (the original series).
"Star Wars" felt _real_. Lightsabers, the use of a "Force" where you could physically moves things from a distance, the glissando effect when a starship goes into hyperspace-- these were all incredibly credible and mind-blowing to people back then.
Star Wars didn't just live up to its hype-- it has exceeded it, becoming a fixture in American culture, and becoming a franchise that continues to generate interest and income today.
It's just p-hacking or random chance and a news outlet's way of generating clicks for itself. These findings are made public, and then almost always quietly disappear into the churn of other scientific ideas of dubious validity.
If only the follow-up, larger (n >> 50) study that later is conducted that reports negative results was as widely reported and disseminated.
To add to this list:
- Manuals. Reading carefully through the documentation was necessary for mastery. Both hardware and software. These were often closely associated-- you couldn't always just concentrate on one and abstract away the other.
But the sleep tracking has been awful. A lot of days I'll get up, sit in a chair, and will surf the web for several minutes, say 45 minutes, and the watch inevitably records this time as also sleep. It's quite ridiculous and the software doesn't allow you to edit the log with the correct time. You can only delete entries, not edit them.
Example: on Sunday, I woke up, drove 20 minutes to a trailhead, proceeded to strenuously hike for an hour, drove 20 minutes back. When I checked the sleep log later that day, the watch had automatically assumed I had been sleeping through the entire hike.
I like most other things about this watch, but sleep tracking is not one of them.
But I can't help but wonder: how much of this is envy? Who wouldn't want to be perceived as inspirational and forward-thinking when seeking support for a pet business endeavor?
The choice of which words to use to market your idea, the value of being able to recruit people to fulfill the idea, the ability to persuade people to fund your idea. Isn't there some value provided by inspirational leadership?
Neumann may have duped a credulous Son, but he put WeWork in the position where it received Son's consideration.
I'm not excusing the grifting and self-enriching.
At the same time, I've seen situations where the charisma and the resolute determination of a leader makes a huge difference in how the team executes. WeWork may be a glaring example of what not to do, but it's also an example of the value of politicking-- of agilely positioning your endeavor to receive investment, both monetary and emotional.
Answer: PostgreSQL > MySQL
Postgres implementation of SQL includes a few useful clauses that are useful for analytics that MySQL does not support.
It used to be that MySQL had no window functions, and that made it wholly inferior to Postgres when it came to analytics. However, it seems MySQL began supporting window functions two years ago, so that is no longer a reason to choose one over the other.
There are at least two features supported in Postgres that are not available in MySQL that I use often enough to care:
• SELECT DISTINCT ON
• FULL OUTER JOIN
Having these saves dev time. It is possible to implement either using MySQL, but your code will be more verbose, creating more opportunities for error.
If you care about analyzing the data for data-scientific purposes, you would be better off using Postgres. It isn't just the couple of extra clauses. It's also having more (useful) indexing choices and little choices like being able to use two pipes (||) to concatenate strings instead of CONCAT().
We're Uniform Teeth — the first premium, clinically credible consumer brand in orthodontics. We're making orthodontics cheaper, faster, and more accessible for everyone, plus we're backed by the same investors as Warby, Instacart, Casper and GoodRx. Read about us in TechCrunch.
## The Environment
Fast-growing startup, small engineering team (~4 members right now), more greenfield than legacy code
## The Role
You love React. We love React. You’ll work on every aspect of the business, creating a superb experience for our customers.
## Responsibilities:
• Build features on our react native app (non-native code), EMR and lab tool • Integrate real-time integration with our API via websockets • Maintain (and improve) code quality, test coverage, and engineering acumen • Work with product, clinical, and our engineering team to define specs and dictate how features will be build
## Follow-up Info
How to apply: Visit our Careers page at https://www.uniformteeth.com/careers/.
Feel free to email me at jerry [at] uniformteeth.com if you intend to apply— happy to answer any questions you may have.
We’re also recruiting several positions not specific to tech, for onsite in SF: clinic managers, sales managers, orthodontic assistants, lab technicians, packaging and shipping specialists, CAD/CAM dental technicians.
A much nicer mobile interface for consuming HN, but you'll have to go direct to the site to interact with it.
Uniform Teeth is a fast growing startup making high-quality orthodontic care more affordable for everyone. Our main focus currently is straightening teeth by using clear aligners.
Uniform Teeth's competitive advantages in this market: (1) a focus on one service, allowing for optimization of every aspect of the business (marketing, operations, manufacturing, and clinical care); (2) shorter treatment times; (3) lower prices; (4) ability to handle complex cases; (5) single-minded devotion to customer service and excellent dental care. Check out our reviews [0].
We’re looking for a full stack engineer to join the Engineering team. This team builds functionality for our customers (patients), clinicians, support team, and manufacturing. Looking for primarily onsite, allowing for a fair degree of remote work once you grok the codebase.
Tech stack: Ruby, React, React Native, Go, AWS (EC2, VPC, S3, KMS, Redshift), Docker
For more information, including how to apply, please visit our Careers page at https://www.uniformteeth.com/careers/ . Please email me at jerry(at)u------t----.com if you intend to apply— I’d be happy to answer any questions you may have.
We’re also recruiting several positions not specific to tech, for onsite in SF: clinic manager, sales manager, orthodontic assistant, lab technician, packaging and shipping specialist, CAD/CAM dental technician.
Uniform Teeth is a fast growing startup making high-quality orthodontic care more affordable for everyone. Our main focus currently is straightening teeth by using clear aligners.
Uniform Teeth's competitive advantages in this market: (1) a focus on one service, allowing for optimization of every aspect of the business (marketing, operations, manufacturing, and clinical care); (2) shorter treatment times; (3) lower prices; (4) ability to handle complex cases; (5) single-minded devotion to customer service and excellent dental care. Check out our reviews [0].
We’re looking for a full stack engineer to join the Engineering team. This team builds functionality for our customers (patients), clinicians, support team, and manufacturing. Looking for primarily onsite, allowing for a fair degree of remote work once you grok the codebase.
Tech stack: Ruby, React, React Native, Go, AWS (EC2, VPC, S3, KMS, Redshift), Docker
For more information, including how to apply, please visit our Careers page at https://www.uniformteeth.com/careers/ . Please email me at jerry [at] uniformteeth.com if you intend to apply— happy to answer any questions you may have.
We’re also recruiting several positions not specific to tech, for onsite in SF: clinic manager, sales manager, orthodontic assistant, lab technician, packaging and shipping specialist, CAD/CAM dental technician.
I believe the 90% claim, historically, is close to valid. A fairer representation might have been 5 in 6 (83.3%), but it was pretty close to the mark. You can see where people in the early cohorts are working, and the success rate is very high.
What has changed? (1) Job market is more competitive. There are more "graduates" of "boot camp"s out there, as well as graduates of accredited degree programs.
(2) Admissions standards have dropped. With more boot camps, there are more students attending boot camps everywhere. Galvanize used to admit half as many students. Correspondingly, less qualified applicants are attending boot camps than before. More than half the reason prior Galvanize graduates succeeded in obtaining data-scientific positions was because many of them were already very well qualified for many STEM jobs _before_ entering the program.
(3) Hiring standards have tightened. With a body of data scientists out there, organizations don't need to hire newbies.
Boot camps can augment your résumé, but can't substitute for lack of relevant experience. A data science bootcamp will have great difficulty in magically taking a person from 0 to a data scientist job offer in the absence of relevant experience. Many of the people I've seen struggle to obtain employment had thin résumés before entering the program or had weak interview skills.
Or maybe Fabian or Frankie Avalon?
I love this kind of challenge.
Good science requires a tension between hypothesis generation and skepticism. Perhaps if we rewarded the _debunking_ of findings as much as we do the discovery of findings, things would change.
And, as mentioned by keyanp, Randy Pausch's "Last Lecture". Vita brevis. Carpe diem.
Townsquared is the only online network that allows local businesses and independent professionals to connect privately. Members have access to all of the other businesses in their local neighborhood to ask and answer questions, post events, find partners, and ultimately build thriving businesses.
We are a Series B funded startup (Sierra Ventures, Intuit, August Capital, Floodgate, among others) in the heart of San Francisco with a diverse team of driven people working at the intersection of cutting-edge design, complex technology, and social good. We offer the ability to help build a product that enables economic change and affects people in a real way.
We're hiring for many roles including: • Data Engineer: https://townsquared.com/blog/job/data-engineer/ • Full Stack Engineer: https://townsquared.com/blog/job/full-stack-engineer-levels/ • Front End Engineer: https://townsquared.com/blog/job/front-end-engineer-all-leve... • VP or Director of Marketing: https://townsquared.com/blog/job/vp-of-marketing/
Please apply here https://townsquared.com/join-our-team/
The interview process involves submitting a resume, a phone screen in which you will be expected to work on a coding problem, and a half-day interview that would include interviews with several people and also a technical challenge (i.e., working on a different coding problem). We may pair-program with you on these challenges.
If you have questions, you may email me at what you think my first name is (at) townsquared.com. I may not answer right away; please be patient.
If you decide to apply, please be aware that, at this moment, if you choose to upload your resume as a PDF file, there is no notification of a successful upload. We’ll fix that soon. If you send in an application without a resume, we’ll let you know that you need to forward one anyway.
You may claim you were referred by a “Team Member”, but you should email me to let me know.
Please spare us from more tiny sample studies.
From an expected value perspective, however, lotteries are generally money LOSERS. Even at the estimated $1.5 billion for this Wednesday's drawing, the expected value of purchasing a ticket is NEGATIVE.
Here's why: the $1.5 billion is paid as an annuity-- the reported lump sum (present value) payment would be $930 million. Depending on your tax situation, if you live in the USA, you would lose about 40% of that to federal taxes, leaving you with about $558 million. In that it costs you $2 to purchase one number and the odds are 292 million to 1, you would need the take-home jackpot to be 2 times $292 million, or $584 million dollars before the expected value to be zero. (And this assumes a world in which jackpots cannot be split! And that you have no taxes beyond the federal tax!)
So the best play really is to NOT PLAY. From an expected value perspective, it probably would make sense to play when the jackpot is over $2 billion. It would depend on the frequency distribution of split jackpots.
So IF you're going to play, then you should try to minimize the chance you win a share of a split jackpot. But the rational play is to NOT PLAY AT ALL (well, at least not until the jackpot grows larger).
To me, the conclusions don't meet the sniff test. Drawing causal inferences from social science data is tricky, and I think it's more likely the study is flawed in one of the many ways observational data analyses are often flawed.
Regardless, IMHO we as a society should praise hard work and effort rather than lauding those who "win" the "intelligence" lottery.
https://www.change.org/p/timothy-d-cook-replace-or-fix-all-2...
It's ludicrous that to attempt to fix this problem, you would have to go so far as to bake your laptop.
It cost me over $US 500 to get this fixed at an Apple Store.