News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

jeppester

I'm also getting tired of this. But I don't know where to go instead.

What is the best drop-in OSS replacement that has support for skills and mcps?

In the case of Xbox, you'd get something comparable to Xbox Series X (or S in some situations). So it's hardly comparable to a multi-thousand dollar rig.
Re:Plan Mode Is Dead on Saturday September 26, 2026 @02:26AM (#49853788)
In my experience it's really good at making you feel that you understand things.

Then when you actually dig into the code, there are many things that are not like you'd expect.

When you've experienced that a few times, you stop trusting that the agent gives you the full picture - for good reason.

When I review AI generated code I generally find so many flaws that it makes it hard for me to believe that those who are not reviewing their output are not just fooling themselves. Maybe not all the time, but quite often.

One such recent example was an SSO simulator for a local env. Instead of using a cookie to remember who was logged in, the agent remembered the last log in a variable, assuming the the next requests would come from that login.

This snowballed into our tests, where later agents had created helper tools for working around the SSO simulators statefulness.

Re:What About Rails? on Friday September 25, 2026 @04:14PM (#49849334)
What exactly would make those systems 100x more maintainable?
Re:Feeling Sad about AI on Friday September 11, 2026 @01:45PM (#49662376)
Exactly. I feel that agentic programming is largely turning what would have in the past been actual understanding into some kind of fluffy superficial pseudo "understanding" that's only barely good enough when assisted by AI.
Re:Don't Paste the AI, please on Thursday August 20, 2026 @05:45AM (#49372431)
They will paste it to their agent and ask it to live up to those requirements
Re:My server is a phone now on Sunday August 09, 2026 @03:12AM (#49229134)
Second hand SFF office PCs are super good for this. Machines like Lenovo Thinkcentre or Dell Optiplex.

Because there are so many of them (at least in Denmark where I live) they are pretty cheap and it's easy to get one with an I-processor.

My current machine's idle draw is also very low at 5-6w.*

*Based on some quick research it does seem that I was a bit lucky with mine, so I guess it's fair to mention that mileage may vary.

My boss tried to make me interested in agentic programming by showing me how "productive" the creator of OpenClaw is.

All I see is a fast food factory. Sure it's interesting that you can produce so much so quickly. But what is produced is endlessly uninteresting to me. It doesn't help that all the harness building is just SEO in disguise. Trial and error.

I don't doubt that agentic programming makes it possible to produce faster, but it also comes at a great cost for me, which is that I largely don't enjoy my job anymore. If I was given the choice between that and halving my salary I would have chosen the latter.

Re:Resetting Xbox on Monday July 06, 2026 @12:13PM (#48806690)
Xbox is ahead of Sony on this path. Their studios often, if not most of the time, release physical games that require a full download to play.

I doubt that they will go back to where Sony are now.

Re:Steam Machine on Tuesday June 23, 2026 @08:38AM (#48644031)
I don't disagree that this device is very likely too expensive to sell well.

But! The price is not insulting. You can built a slightly faster PC for a little less, but that PC would be ~10 times larger, it would be louder, it would lack features like HDMI-CEC and good wifi/bluetooth. It really wouldn't compare for living room usage.

In order to get anywhere near the size of the Steam Machine, you'd have to exceed its costs.

Re:When I reject AI code even if it works on Sunday June 21, 2026 @01:58AM (#48616062)
Yesterday Claude wanted to add a position column to what is a slightly extended many-many relation table. It did this to "make ordering stable".

An average enterprise developer would never add bloat like that up-front, unless if the ability to change the order was a requirement.

Obviously a stable order can be easily derived from the ID or a creation time (if available).

Setting a position however requires extra steps to ensure the integrity of the sequence.

I see things like that all the time, and it's always stuff that grows the code base and adds unnecessary complexity.

Re:The founder's playbook: Building an AI-native startup on Wednesday June 17, 2026 @05:33AM (#48567918)
I'm sure there are at least two in the world
> Watching movies on OLED (or at least on this particular OLED) looks crap, because if you turn motion interpolation OFF, the image looks stuttery, apparently due to OLEDs ultra-low response time, which produces zero fading between adjacent frames. (By the way, why didn't this happen with 35mm movie projectors? They couldn't blend adjacent frames either, because they are just shining light through individual pictures on a sheet of celluloid, yet I don't remember seeing this kind of stutter in movie theatres back in the day!) And turning motion interpolation up a notch already produces the well-known soap opera effect. No, thanks.

My guess would be that it's not so much a difference between projectors and OLEDs as it is a difference between old movies and new movies.

Personally I think that slow pixels is the wrong way to "fix" poor motion blur in movies.

How are the rules broken? How does Temu fix then?

We have rules that should prevent companies from selling broken and dangerous crap. Should I not be upset that Temu ignores those rules deliberately and floods the EU with exactly that?

If it was that simple, surely someone would undercut all the retailers that follow the rules - while also following the rules.

Temu is just deliberately ignoring any rules.

The rules that make someone responsible for when a product is dangerous or broken.

How does that not add any value?

Temu is free to take the same responsibility, but they don't.

That's the thing with these fines. 19/20 times they make a lot of sense. But even so, there will be people saying "but why not this other org" to which the answer is "Yes! Hand out more fines", not "it's unfair, so just let everyone break the law".
If you played a boardgame, wouldn't you be upset if someone won the game easily, because they decided to just break all the rules?
Re:- -dangerously-skip-reading-code – olano.dev on Sunday May 24, 2026 @10:57AM (#48257763)
This leaves out the part where you ask the original developer: "Why does this thing do that?"
Re:There Is No 'Hard Problem of Consciousness' on Monday May 18, 2026 @05:38AM (#48177290)
> What we call “consciousness” is merely a product of evolution, and also a tool shaped by evolution

> When such a system reaches a certain level of complexity, it inevitably generates the concept of “I” as a way to simplify the processing of overwhelming information.

I don't see how this is different from someone saying that a concoction of random ingredients will turn into a magic potion.

The big question is how a group of cells (or potentially something else) becomes sentient. Accepting "because it would be useful" as valid explanation would be the same as accepting Darwinism as a religion rather than science.

That is something we'll need to figure out. Just because it requires some work to figure out where to draw the line, it doesn't make it wrong to draw one.

Banks are generally required to check that their customers are not laundering money. In a lot of countries it's illegal to buy or sell goods that you know are very likely stolen.

It don't think it's outrageous to expect more action from Cloudflare when they must know that their service is used for protecting criminal sites.

Relatedly I'd want the betting companies whose ads are shown on these illegal pages to have some amount of responsibility for where their ads are shown, and the same goes for well-renowned websites that show clearly deceiving ads.

Why though? Why is it unreasonable to expect a company to have some level of responsibility for serving clients that are using their platform for illegal activity?

It the same thing with social media and moderation. We don't have to let them off the hook just because doing the right thing would make them unprofitable.

Re:Zed is 1.0 on Wednesday April 29, 2026 @11:33AM (#47949857)
I use it a lot with Claude Code.

It lacks a lot of features, but IMO feels less "busy" than the terminal version, which I like.

Very recently Zed also gained support for parallel sessions, which is nice. In general it's very obvious that a lot of effort goes into improving it, and it gets better with every release.

Re:Zed is 1.0 on Wednesday April 29, 2026 @11:23AM (#47949703)
I love the search in zed. If it was up to me it would open a new tab on every search rather than reusing the same tab, so that I didn't have to redo past searches.

The multibuffer result is so nice for "hands-on" search and replace.

Re:Who owns the code Claude Code wrote? on Wednesday April 29, 2026 @03:39AM (#47945238)
A more logical explanation would be that there are different opinions and those who complain are usually louder.
With the battery no longer a concern, more people will opt to buy used phones rather than cheap new phones.

Som even if most people change phone before the battery gets really bad (I doubt that this is really the case), the end result will still be that fewer new phones will be purchased.

Now we just need a law that requires hardware makers unlock their devices when they stop providing updates.

Re:Claude Code Routines on Wednesday April 15, 2026 @05:43AM (#47776814)
The guesswork lies in the "how to poke the black box in the right way", not in the code itself.
Re:Claude Code Routines on Tuesday April 14, 2026 @06:00PM (#47772052)
I always hated SEO because it was not an exact science - like programming was.

Too bad we've now managed to turn programming into the same annoying guesswork.

I totally agree, except for the last part where you attack a straw man.

I'm not talking about the view from my front porch, I'm talking about solar panels in nearly every direction, like a sort of barrier, choking the town.

As mentioned we do have solar panels in some directions, we just don't want them everywhere.

Also there's no dichotomy here, it's not a choice between choking small towns and saving the planet vs. the opposite.

I'm arguing that we should first and foremost place solar panels where people already do not want to live for various reasons. The incentives we've created so far have not been good at that.

Update: I realise that I misread the first part of your comment. The agriculture that the panels are replacing is probably what you would call monoculture. It would however seem that the monoculture you picture looks very different from what we have in Denmark. If you think about endless "field deserts" that's not what it is. That is also why people like to live here.

The fields that the solar farms are replacing were generating food for everyone, including those who live in the cities.

1-2 days per year the whole town has a smell of manure.

That's is an externality we accepted when we moved here, so we do not complain that the fields need to produce food.

Also, you are implying that we have not accepted any solar panels, which is wrong. We have plenty in the near area. We just don't want all the fields surrounding the town to be plastered with panels.

Older »