jbester
Without sufficient power, the airlines lowered the amount of allowed weight on allowed on international flights and thus the seats had better spacing. Later models starting form the -200 model had more powerful engines so they crammed in more passengers - both in coach and in first class.
The immediate pseudo-instruction:
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc....
The regular form:
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc....
Vendor - https://www.sparkfun.com/products/11158
OEM - http://papilio.cc/
This is the same set of regulations Robert Gates famously complained[1] restricted the export of F16 spare parts from the US. This platforms has been widely exported and this regulation applies to non-weapons related components i.e., canopy latches, flaps, etc.
[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/21/world/21export.html?_r=0
[1] http://m.cnet.com/news/samsung-to-release-high-end-tizen-sma...
I have a hard time believing the flagrant and wanton release of material was and is not suicide by Court Martial.
I would not consider the transcript complimentary, it does not portray a high-minded, moral crusader. It portrays Manning, the depressed, confused, trans-gendered person, acting out against the Military Establishment.
[1] http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/07/manning-lamo-logs/
The background color bleeds into text dramatically lowering the contrast. On computer displays, black on pure white can cause the same issue to a lesser effect. I find black on a pale color is optimal.
1) The code assumes both the client and the server have the same endian. This can be issue since a uint32 is used for both the synchronization code (BCP_CODE) and the port. This can easily fixed with htonl/ntohl conversions.
2) it assumes both the client and the server define int to be the same size (may or may not be true based on compiler/processor/OS combinations). If you use stdint definitions, this typically won't be an issue.
Lawyers are licensed and specialized - the costs associated are passed through to the customers into their rate.
On the server, typically mono is chosen because mono on linux is much cheaper than azure, or windows hosting (AWS, etc) therefore you trading slightly more development and setup effort for cheaper run-time costs.
For the phone/tablet market, you are doing the opposite trading money (monotouch licenses) to save development time and learning a new platform.
On the desktop, I think the value proposition is much less well defined. It depends alot of the mix of clients you are supporting.
There are other tools sharpdevelop (for window) and monodevelop (all platforms) - but they are somewhat lacking. Sharp develop seems to slow down dramatically on large projects or WPF projects. Monodevelop seems to lag sharp develop in features and maturity.
GUI toolkits for dotnet are hit-and-miss. GTK# has the most traction and is cross platform - the documentation was lacking last time I looked. But, if you have a GTK background it may be a non-issue. Wx and QT bindings exist but I believe development has slowed down/stalled. Of course, there are OS X, android and iOS bindings that ximian sells. Unless you have a large existing c# code base it probably doesn't make sense to use them for greenfield development.
Server-side is where I think mono actually does shine a bit. Although you need to move out of the standard NetFX stack (i.e. WCF) to other open source libraries (i.e., ServiceStack). ASP.NET and MVC do run on mono - there are tutorials to deploy against apache or nginx.
As you can imagine there is some lag between mono and microsoft dotnet framework (see http://www.mono-project.com/Compatibility). The gist of it mono tries and succeeds keeping up with the framework but there are large holes with respect to .NET 3.0 (WWF, WCF, WPF). There was a silverlight plugin (moonlight) but much like silverlight new development has stopped.
This approach gives a couple advantages and a couple disadvantages. Specifically, the advantages the debugging and reloading can be done extremely quickly, the bytecode is small thus giving a lot of functionality per the byte of storage space, and it's significantly easier to port from microcontroller to microcontroller. Downsides, it's pretty slow - typically the heavy lifting happens in the HAL/MF, and you can't write interrupt handlers directly in it - although you can indirectly via the managed driver interface.
string.join(['1','2','3'], ' ') == ' '.join(['1','2','3'])