News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

jaywee

I think one of the reasons for this is to have very high throughput charging stations in dense urban areas (like central Beijing).
> "we have to cater to what 96% of users know" Indeed. Just recently saw a talk "Are we stuck with the same Desktop UX forever? | Ubuntu Summit 25.10" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fZTOjd_bOQ) where Scott Jenson (Apple/Google UX) laments we stopped innovating on Desktop.

Such appeal to conformity is indeed quite sad from GNOME.

Re:Economics of Orbital vs. Terrestrial Data Centers on Tuesday December 16, 2025 @02:42PM (#46293380)
Jonathan McDowell keeps track of all the Starlink Sat orbits, including failures:

https://planet4589.org/space/con/star/stats.html

Re:Economics of Orbital vs. Terrestrial Data Centers on Tuesday December 16, 2025 @09:31AM (#46288945)
Don't confuse launch _price_ with launch _cost_. It's been estimated the internal F9 launch costs are around $15M-$20M.

The $5M is a marginal cost-target for fully reusable Starship.

Re:Economics of Orbital vs. Terrestrial Data Centers on Tuesday December 16, 2025 @09:24AM (#46288846)
Quite helpful infographics from ULA: https://blog.ulalaunch.com/hubfs/orbital%20debris.jpeg
Re:Economics of Orbital vs. Terrestrial Data Centers on Tuesday December 16, 2025 @09:17AM (#46288754)
Well, divide et impera. Fairly straightforward for AI inference (not training): The existing Starlink constellation:

3491 V1 sats × 22.68 m² = 79176 m²

5856 V2-mini sats × 104.96 m² = 614 646 m²

Total: 0.7 km² of PERC Mono cells with 23% efficiency.

At around 313W/m² we get 217MW. But half the orbit it's in shade, so only ~100MW.

The planned Starship-launched V2 constellation (40k V3 sats, 256.94 m²) comes out at 10 km², ~1.5GW.

So it's not like these ideas are "out there".

Ideally, in an organization this should be a centrally pushed group policy defining CIDRs.

Like, at home, I have 10/8 and public IPv6 addresses.

Yeah, I had to create a user on many language versions just to keep the old skin. I fail to see a point in wasting 2/3 of my screen estate to whitespace.
Re:Starship Flight 5 license issued by FAA on Saturday October 12, 2024 @08:02PM (#41823903)
Having a 60 days consultation with the Fish and Wildlife Service whether a falling hot-stage ring (essentially dumb steel piece) causes danger to fish is just silly.
Re:Gemini and Google's Culture on Monday February 26, 2024 @03:58PM (#39516714)
Have multiple explicit ones. One liberal, one conservative, one progressive...
Not the first case - It was Kodak who built the first digital camera after all.
Re:How much bigger could Earth be before rockets wouldn't work? on Saturday February 03, 2024 @11:40PM (#39247677)
NTR is a very inefficient use of nuclear fuel. What you want is a NSWR: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_salt-water_rocket

A true nuclear rocket. Just like a chemical rocket is a controlled explosion, NSWR is a controlled (cough) nuclear explosion.

Sun wanted to do the same thing in late 90ties - picoJAVA (embedded), microJava and UltraJava (VLIW workstations).

Relegated to the dustbin of history.

Re:So you want custom allocator support in your C library on Monday December 18, 2023 @12:26AM (#38679516)
It can be - the allocator just needs to mmap() different bucket pools to different base addresses.
Re:SpaceX broke its record for number of launches in a year on Sunday September 10, 2023 @10:24PM (#37462133)
In May SpaceX reported they have 1.5M subscribers. At $100/month, that's $1.8B/year revenue. Not bad.
Re:Why does the USA use 110V and UK use 230-240V? on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @03:59PM (#37313091)
Impulse Labs, a startup, is doing lithium-backed kitchen stoves. Claims to heat-up 1L of water in ~40secs. That's at least 8.6kW.

https://twitter.com/sdamico/status/1592553611879673856?s=20

Re:Why does the USA use 110V and UK use 230-240V? on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @03:49PM (#37312957)
The 400V is between phases. 230V is between a phase and ground. Ie, you get 3 wires (phases) of 230V from the 400V connection.

Btw, Europe standardized at 230/400V in the nineties. In Czechia we switched from 220V to 230V in 1993. Not sure when Italy did, but probably around the same time.

>That's where we're at: Just randomly select some parameters until the data fits, and lo and behold, it fits.

When I read that it felt like a Monte-Carlo simulation. A legit approach in modeling. And indeed - the link to the paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.09895

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monte_Carlo_method

Re:There’s No Algorithms on Monday November 21, 2022 @04:49PM (#33698495)
Here's a thought from a former Twitter dev on timeline-vs-top: https://social.lot23.com/@jon/109372257422277945