News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

jasonmclaren

Strangely, their Pricing page shows they don't offer SSO until the third pricing tier, at $99/user-month.
You may be interested in reading Nicholson Baker's novel The Mezzanine, where he wrote about preferring paper straws.

http://weblibrary.apeiron-uni.eu:8080/webdokumenti/6304-ip.p...

Can you elaborate? My understanding is that nicotine raises blood pressure, which is a big part of what's harmful about cigarettes.
Re:Does “skipping meals make you live longer”? on Thursday October 21, 2021 @02:35PM (#28949034)
I would echo this general idea of recalibrating, and add a refinement.

Instead of believing the process and waiting for months to see if it works, you can weigh yourself every day and look at the moving average. That will let you ignore the natural daily fluctuations, but still give you regular feedback.

In my experience, that regular feedback really helps with the motivation to keep doing the calorie counting.

Re:Open-Source Controller for the IKEA Bekant Standing Desk on Monday January 28, 2019 @03:30PM (#19020782)
I also had a Skarsta, and the crank mechanism came apart within about six months. (I raised/lowered it a half-dozen times per day.) I personally found the Bekant more reliable (though I only used it for a year). YMMV, I guess.

On the other hand, my Steelcase standing desk is still performing well after 7(?) years and several moves, but it was C$1500.

Re:The Logic of Risk Taking on Wednesday October 04, 2017 @11:51PM (#15406579)
There are different ways to measure how much people value their lives. Some of the most interesting involve "revealed preferences", ie. what people actually do, not what they say.

For example, how much higher wages do people demand for riskier work, controlling for other factors? Or, how much extra do they pay for, say, a car with a better safety record?

I just checked the Wikipedia article on the "value of a statistical life", and apparently most current US estimates are around $9 million. This is up from around $7 million a decade ago.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Value_of_life

Re:Post-Olympic Abandonment on Wednesday February 22, 2017 @03:14PM (#13708771)
After the Vancouver Olympics, I half-jokingly proposed a Distributed Olympics:

https://invisiblesummer.net/2012/08/12/towards-a-distributed...

Summary:

1. The host city gets it for 40 years, to amortize the cost of building the facilities and to improve through experience.

2. Distribute groups of sports (skiing events, swimming events, etc) to different host cities, to reduce the impact on each city and to foster a sense of international cooperation.

3. Stagger the events throughout the year, to avoid scheduling conflicts and viewer burnout.

The HN headline ("Free money for all") is a bit misleading. The article states that the basic income will only be given to 2000 randomly selected unemployed people.
More expensive relative to some measure of underlying value like earnings or book value. If you look at the P/E ratio (price-to-earnings) of a stock, a higher ratio means you're paying more to buy enough stock to get $1 of earnings, which in a sense means that the stock is more expensive.
Re:How Tesla-Toyota Project Led to Culture Clash by Opposites on Tuesday August 12, 2014 @06:43PM (#8170606)
Wikipedia says that in practice, fuel cells are 40-60% energy efficient, compared to 25% for a typical internal combustion engine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_cell#Theoretical_maximum_...

Comparing tank-to-wheel efficiency of the whole vehicle, fuel-cell vehicles average 36%, compared to 22% for diesel.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_cell#In_practice

Could you explain how you got the 10% / 20% efficiency numbers you mentioned? Your combustion numbers are in the same ballpark, but you got a much different result for fuel cells.

Genuinely curious, thanks!