jasamer
I don't think this is going to happen anytime soon. LLMs may be able to somewhat compete with people who are average at these creative tasks, but those are not the people whose work most people consume. We listen to music and read books by people who are very good at creating music/writing, and I don't see LLMs competing with those people. And even if they were able to compete, they'd still miss the "human" element - eg., I'm probably not going to a concert if there are no humans performing.
AI will expand to be able to do more boring, menial tasks. Writers and musicians (and other creative people) will probably be amongst the last who loose their jobs to AI.
In other words, the universe simulating ours might work completely differently, and some beings there are just testing how different laws of physics (i.e. ours) work out.
The point of it is: they were going to do a skeuomorphic animation, and they put the effort in to do it right. It's a level of polish that I really appreciate, even though it isn't really necessary for anything.
It’s an effect that’s quite complicated to do. You need to put the page on a 3D cone and render that. I have quite a bit of experience with UI kit animations, but I don’t know how I would do that one.
But even when including possible jail time in your consideration: if you think that saving two lives at the cost of another is worth it, surely a life saved is worth more than a jail sentence?
As the author explained in another comment, it initially generates the code coverage for all tests. When code is changed, only the tests that cover that code are rerun.
It doesn't need to rely on "test change likelihood" - if a code change is outside of the code coverage of the test, it doesn't affect the test.
[1] https://www.happyfolding.com/instructions-fujimoto-hydrangea
The Factorio devs regularly put out blog posts on the optimisations they have done, like [1][2][3] (and many others), and they have done so for a long time. This gives me the opposite impression.
[1] https://factorio.com/blog/post/fff-322 [2] https://factorio.com/blog/post/fff-281 [3] https://factorio.com/blog/post/fff-209
When we say something is Turing complete, there’s always an implicit “if it ran on a computer with unlimited memory” assumption that comes with it, because no computer with limited memory can ever simulate all Turing machines. You can always construct a Touring machine that makes a given computer run out of memory.
So technically, no real computer or computer program is Turing complete, or able to accurately simulate any Turing machine. The whole thing is an irrelevant technicality though, as A) we have so much memory available that we might as well treat it as unlimited and B) touring completeness is a theoretical property - if you prove it for something like python type hints, that proof won’t assume any memory limitations, ie. it’ll assume the computer the thing runs on has infinite memory. The proof is valid even though no such infinite computer actually exists.
After seven years and 500 million euro spent, the project was cancelled and they went back to using their old inventory system.
So, in this case, customising SAP to fit the company's processes wasn't worth it even for a rather large company like Lidl.
To be fair, I’m not sure whether similar optimizations exist for computing the factorial, but I don’t think so.
Peter: "My number is [X]." Sandy: I know the answer!
But I guess it's worth it when you factor in that without security, football fans might trash the place and mess other people up like you describe.
date.getYear() + "-" + date.getMonth() + "-" + date.getDay()
in the hope of getting something like "2022-1-4".The actual result for that date is "122-0-2" - not a single component of the date was what I expected.
I'd have thought that nuclear requires the least amount of space of all energy sources.
2. The iPhone can detect the distance to the AirTag quite precisely. I think this type of false positive is going to be rare enough for notification fatigue not being a problem. In your bus example, reporting the false positive would be fine imo. (It would also allow you to return the air tag to the owner).
3. The notifications don't go through Apple's servers, so Apple would need a backdoor in the OS to disable the feature. They might have added something like this, but it might not matter much - if someone plants a tracking device on you, they'll use one without silly privacy features.
Apple’s Apps are better targets of course because those are on every phone.
https://www.ft.com/content/4da1117e-756c-11e9-be7d-6d846537a...
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/09/psa-you-dont-have-to...
I'd assume FB, Google & co have some solution to b), so Apple should be able to figure out something. For c), at least Apple takes extra precautions by requiring the photos to be in two separate database provided by different governments. (Maybe other cloud providers do that, too, I don't know).
How would you use this to find criminals in general? I have a hard time to think of a very useful example. Maybe photos of bomb plans downloaded somewhere from the internet that are known to be used by criminal groups?
As to what stops a pedophile or a journalist form disabling iCloud photo storage: Absolutely nothing. This solution is supposed catch people storing CSAM photos in iCloud, that's it. A careful pedophile will not be caught by this.