jannie123
Re:Lose weight the slow and incredibly difficult way
on Friday September 23, 2022 @10:18AM (#32952283)
simple != easy
Re:Making a Maradona: Meat Consumption and Soccer Prowess
on Sunday July 24, 2022 @01:09PM (#32215439)
also took hgh bc of his growth hormone disorder
Re:What's New in Ada 2022
on Tuesday June 21, 2022 @05:42PM (#31829432)
join a defense contractor
Re:Overengineered Japanese Mechanical Pencils [video]
on Saturday April 16, 2022 @08:38AM (#31051815)
More ableist I think. Some people have bad handwriting due to physical or neurological conditions
Re:OnlyFans ghostwriters, who say their job includes catfishing paying...
on Monday December 20, 2021 @07:20PM (#29632242)
In what world is this the "only way to chat with the opposite gender"
Re:Bob Dole has died
on Sunday December 05, 2021 @07:15PM (#29454713)
For McCain they view him fairly well (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2018/08/27/how-vietnam-...) and idk for Dole but I'd be surprised if they knew him (he didn't fight in vietnam btw if that's what your implying)
Re:A Stoic Philosopher in a Hanoi Prison
on Thursday July 15, 2021 @11:31AM (#27845899)
"Do you want to live "according to nature"? O you noble Stoics, what a verbal swindle! Imagine a being like nature - extravagant without limit, indifferent without limit, without purposes and consideration, without pity and justice, simultaneously fruitful, desolate, and unknown - imagine this indifference itself as a power - how could you live in accordance with this indifference?8 Living - isn't that precisely a will to be something different from what this nature is? Isn't living appraising, preferring, being unjust, being limited, wanting to be different? And if your imperative "live according to nature" basically means what amounts to "live according to life"- why can you not just do that? Why make a principle out of what you yourselves are and must be? The truth of the matter is quite different: while you pretend to be in raptures as you read the canon of your law out of nature, you want something which is the reverse of this, you weird actors and self-deceivers! Your pride wants to prescribe to and incorporate into nature, this very nature, your morality, your ideal. You demand that nature be "in accordance with the stoa ," and you'd like to make all existence merely living in accordance with your own image of it - as a huge and eternal glorification and universalizing of stoicism! With all your love of truth, you have forced yourselves for such a long time and with such persistence and hypnotic rigidity to look at nature falsely, that is, stoically, until you're no long capable of seeing nature as anything else - and some abysmal arrogance finally inspires you with the lunatic hope that, because you know how to tyrannize over yourselves - Stoicism is self-tyranny - nature also allows herself to be tyrannized. Is the Stoic then not a part of nature?.... But this is an ancient eternal story: what happened then with the Stoics is still happening today, as soon as a philosophy begins to believe in itself. It always creates a world in its own image. It cannot do anything different. Philosophy is this tyrannical drive itself, the spiritual will to power, to a "creation of the world," to the causa prima [first cause]."
Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil, Aphorism 9