jander

> Plus, people have a tendency to test things at far too low a level.

That's usually what drives people away from TDD. A very good approach for this is described at this article by Dave Hunt: https://medium.com/@davidihunt/tdd-and-complexity-1bbd5ca51e...

Amen :-)

Assuming they have a solid and reasonable argument against it and not just hand-waving and throwing toys out of the pram :-) . In which case, if they do, I would love to see it.

Hmm sorry, I've never heard of TDD guaranteeing quality of a product. It _might_ mean you've delivered what's been asked of you (along with acceptance testing) but quality? Far from it. And if you're unit testing _after_ the fact, then you're just asking for trouble.

"TDD is not an option" and yet,at the same breath ".. unit tested.."? I'm puzzled, care to elaborate the logic behind your statements?

Well done guys. An important step in adoption and a vote of confidence.

Which perhaps shows how little "folks" care about who they share their data with. Additionally I have private organisation repos that I really don't want you taking a peek at. Sorry, no dice for me unless this is tightened up.

Maybe I grok access privs incorrectly but..

Personal user data Full access This application will be able to read and write all user data. This includes the following:

Private email addresses Profile information Followers

Why read AND write? Why all data?