jamann
Re:Intercal: Practically Impossible
on Sunday June 25, 2023 @06:19AM (#36466658)
This is relatable to CEOs thus they now feel obliged to mention AI in every earnings call.
Re:Everything that uses configuration files should report where they'r...
on Sunday June 25, 2023 @05:49AM (#36466477)
How long does it take you to type out that path?
Re:Make your programs run faster by better using the data cache (2020)
on Saturday June 24, 2023 @06:52AM (#36457478)
Using polars and rust might be the best option right now, offering high level operations such as SQL like joins as well as performance. Although im not a rust programmer and i only use tbe python library polars, so please correct me as necessary.
Re:Make your programs run faster by better using the data cache (2020)
on Saturday June 24, 2023 @06:44AM (#36457437)
Thats when you do polars.DataFrame.to_numpy()
Re:Make your programs run faster by better using the data cache (2020)
on Saturday June 24, 2023 @06:36AM (#36457407)
> an array of structures, the compiler/language should be able to turn that into a structure of arrays
class Point:
i: int
def get_x():
return x_array[i]
# shift every pointx_array += 1
Re:Flow Proof Helps Mathematicians Find Stability in Chaos
on Saturday June 17, 2023 @10:50AM (#36370669)
》 if, for instance, you don’t care how fast the particle is moving but only which way it’s facing at any moment in time — you could describe its motion using a three-dimensional state space.
This is assuming we are on a curve across 2D space like the equator and face east or west. This sentence was puzzling me at first glance. In usual 3D space, direction/orientation is represented as a 3 dimensonal vector with length one, so on top of the position dimensions, that makes six dimensions, even if we dont care about magnitude of direction a.k.a. speed. Using angle coordinates changes the support domain, but still three dimensions are needed for direction.
Re:Our Plan for Python 3.13
on Saturday June 17, 2023 @09:16AM (#36369925)
What you wrote is naive. I dont think AI will ever be able to guess what correct output for arbitrary inputs should look like, just based on examples. You need to specify an algorithm that produces the correct output for all inputs. AI could be able to optimize that, but not fill in gaps in the definition of the goal.