itsallbs
Re:The Dark Side Of Software Development That No One Talks About
on Monday September 09, 2013 @01:13PM (#6354679)
And some devs have the idea that they are Better Than You, no matter what your skill level or expertise. I'm a web dev and worked on a project recently with a lead who had just enough experience with web dev of the 90's to be dangerous. For example, he fought with me repeatedly about md5 being good enough for password hashing, while I wanted to use bcrypt (or at the very least, SHA1, even though it's almost as bad as md5). It took weeks before he relented, and only after I sent him several articles about how broken md5 is. In the end we wound up removing encryption entirely because it made his deployment process harder.
I've got a new job.
Re:Elon Musk took the futuristic gesture interface from Iron Man and m...
on Friday September 06, 2013 @08:35AM (#6340080)
This is definitely not geared toward techies. The closeup of the mouse and keyboard in the first few seconds is meant to make average people think "Oooh, this is high tech."
Re:How “cell tower dumps” caught the High Country Bandits, and why it ...
on Thursday August 29, 2013 @10:53AM (#6296133)
What idiots...bringing their personal cell phones to crime scenes.
Re:I'm 23, An Entrepreneur, and Fucking Terrified.
on Thursday August 22, 2013 @11:33AM (#6257760)
I remember when I was this dramatic. I have no doubt that the emotions he experiences are very real, but he has no frame of reference to see all this for what it is: not really a big deal. If he fails, it sounds like he has a safety net and support to get on his feet and try again. There's no shame in being "mediocre" and having a 9-5 as long as he doesn't get complacent and lose his drive.
Any decent entrepreneur, however, is not going to lose that drive and desire. I know I haven't, and I've yet to achieve what this kid has. Even if he fails, he tried. He'll learn a ton and will be better-equipped for the next go-round.
Re:Groklaw legal site shuts over fears of NSA email snooping
on Tuesday August 20, 2013 @08:27AM (#6243220)
We are at an interesting juncture of history. It seems like Snowden has accomplished what he set out do to: raise awareness of government abuse and bring about positive change. Initial fears after the NSA leaks seemed to be that the public would become outraged and then forget about it. Clearly, this is not happening. A more secure Internet is needed, and instances like this highlight that necessity.
Re:Stephen Fry: Putin is making scapegoats of gay people, just as Hitl...
on Wednesday August 07, 2013 @11:05AM (#6173289)
Rate me HN
Re:Google Chrome security flaw offers unrestricted password access
on Wednesday August 07, 2013 @08:42AM (#6172367)
How the hell did this make the HN front page? This is a tempest in a teapot.
Re:Stop Focusing on What You Don't Have
on Tuesday August 06, 2013 @02:31PM (#6168299)
It's very easy to fall into this mental trap. Developers are creative people by definition; we of all people have no excuse to pass the blame for our lack of success to another. It's a way of avoiding responsibility and completely counterproductive to success. Great post.
Re:“NASDAQ is owned.” Five men charged in largest financial hack ever
on Thursday July 25, 2013 @07:34PM (#6105656)
'SQL-injection vulnerabilities in the victim companies' websites'
/facepalm
Re:What I learned from doing a Kickstarter
on Saturday July 06, 2013 @04:27PM (#5999969)
This is the kind of posts I'd like to see more of on HN. So many of the posts here are titled "How I did X" or "Why Z matters" and then neglect to go very in-depth at all with how X was accomplished or the importance of Z.
Re:The 4 AM Army
on Tuesday July 02, 2013 @11:19AM (#5978352)
The future? Pay attention, hombre. This is the fucking present.
Re:Lawyers said Bush couldn’t spy on Americans. He did it anyway.
on Friday June 28, 2013 @08:42AM (#5957612)
This is why transparency is essential to the processes of government. Without it, the powers that be can increase their authority unchecked. Concerns over national security should come second to whether or not government is truly acting in the best interests of the public. There are tradeoffs for security, but privacy should not be the price we pay to remain "free."
Re:Schrödinger’s Rapist: a guy’s guide
on Wednesday June 26, 2013 @11:06AM (#5946495)
> In practice it just means girls will think I’m not interested in them.
My point exactly. Railing against the system as it exists is counterproductive unless you have a viable alternative.
Re:Schrödinger’s Rapist: a guy’s guide
on Wednesday June 26, 2013 @10:46AM (#5946384)
That's not the point of the article. The point is to give men a guide on a woman's perspective when he approaches her. Yes, the entire game should be changed, but that is beside the point.
It is a valid assumption that men are the initiators because in most cases this is how the world works. If you want to change it, feel free.
Re:Facebook is Blocking Connections from Tor Network
on Tuesday June 18, 2013 @08:39AM (#5898758)
Because if you are trying to reach a mass audience, you have to go where the audience is. If no one sees your message, you are wasting the time and effort used to communicate that message.
Re:What people are googling in real time
on Thursday June 13, 2013 @10:40AM (#5874257)
What would be interesting is their process for filtering out private search terms
Re:Submit a Privacy Act Request with the NSA to see what info they hav...
on Wednesday June 12, 2013 @08:15AM (#5867652)
I like how they ask you to send your SSN via e-mail. I mean, electronic e-mail.