iter
Ari.
Doesn't need to be.
If you want to be a Fortune 500 compan, go public and make your VCs rich, you want to control the entire stack form hardware through to data, "monetize" (i.e. hog) everything and hide your algorithms from your competitors and users. This is what movie studios are trying to do.
If you want to have a living and product that is useful to people, you can make enough money from hardware sales. You don't get to ring the bell on NYSE, but I can live without that.
Ari.
My idea is to make and sell devices, and make the software free--as in freedom and as in beer. The business model is that stuff that costs money to make (hardware) costs money to buy. Stuff that users collect (data) I distribute for free. I want to make sure that data that individual users collect is available to users--for any use that they want for it. There are several closed systems on the market. These companies get people to collect data for them--and then lock it up. They create an artificial scarcity of data and try to make money from that scarcity.
I say--let the data flow.
Ari.
My idea is further to have an open RESTful API to the data that anyone can use. I want to make the data genuinely useful to other people. I want to have a GPL-style license for data as well.
SignalActive are in San Mateo. I've been to their office, they are real friendly people.
Cobra has a bluetooth detector: https://cobra.com/detail/cobra-iradar-radar-laser-safety-cam... . It's closed source. You cannot get to the data.
I wonder how much market there is for a kit that requires the user to open up his detector.
Ari.