itemize123

business laundromats

obviously the overlap is tiny so people are not excited.

And yes, nobody is that excited about vatsachak's mathematician-ism. it's just a thing he do. And now it's just a thing AI do.

it just means that the assumptions we are making in the first place is wrong? nothing here is a dead-end because essentially we are at the same place before. people might even go ahead and say now if it's n^1.5 what happens, what results can be true.

i feel like you are arguing there is -- even in the narrow utility of PROOFS -- there is a goodness in being an ostrich with its head in the sand. If that's true, people can still be that ostrich and pretend the bound is now n^1.9 or something.

it is, mainly for subscriptions.

ignoring op's out-of-place personal attacks, what about the world lab's model capability - do you agree?

no way. one is functionally (slightly overhyped) magic. another is better tool.

it's easy to want one

i agree, it's essentially copywriting

u end up with stack based heap likes anyways

unfortunately, the worse of both can be true at once.

if you are reading the comments - it's news to a lot of less-wired-in persons (like most of us)

and still they denied it - it only shows that we have little recourse.

I think it's worse - openai didn't even deny training on their exact manuscript (when they most likely opted out);

it's buried because due to the drama the evidence is scarce

this is not untrue but it's a pendulum swinging back to ancient times man

I think you are overestimating things. While there will be people who don't know - it's probably not as many as you think.

interesting, c -> c++ transition should be smooth though

that's fair. but it outputted non-best version in the first place sometimes too. Now it still output non-best version sometimes.

literally not how it works.

so simply then ratio isn't just dl/up

naming schemes can produce uncountably inf names

i think there must be a scheme of naming that is uncountably infinite too.

that's optimizing a pretty fast already portion of code. unlikely it's the difference maker.

bigger than RotW

One, logically, your statement doesn't follow. They're two different companies that have primarily in different market segment. Two, it's not true in the first place - did we side with apple and its cut of the app store revenue for instance?

not constructive, but also not personal. rude but based on observed facts.

ondemand cloud? b2b?

it's because it is a narrow set of never-pay-a-human. in that world, only certain task won't be done by human.

main reason is the 30days retention; not the plan changes

but surely u differentiate by turns?