isamu_2000

luna is the first model that has outdone gpt-5-mini on the pareto frontier for some of my high value, cost sensitive ai product workflows. it's both cheaper (by about 60% in real world use) and higher quality based on my test harnesses. I was really worried that costs would go up since there wasn't a replacement as of a few weeks ago and gpt-5-mini is scheduled to be sunset toward the end of the year. So long as they don't randomly sunset this model anytime soon, that worry has now subsided.

We’re using GPT-5-mini in an enterprise data-processing workflow, and we too see that GPT-5.4 nano performs materially worse for our requirements, roughly 30% worse as measured through our test suite.

totally agree. and hearing this one-sided diatribe spoken with so much conviction makes my eyes roll to the back of my head, he just "knew" everything was all ai generated.

i suggest having codex review claude's plans. i consistently find it catches 2nd order effects of planned changes much better which can lead to a total change of direction in some cases.

https://github.com/dorny/paths-filter ? looking into it.

Definitely going through and pinning all my 3rd party actions to specific commits e.g. party/package@<commitsha>.