imachine1980

as Argentinian , other south American country we have cities without energy next to power generation plants, and subsidizes for sector who don needed (residential downtown) but have political influence, i live in the richest and biggest cities of my country and i have subside transportation while,in the north who have a lot less resource pay the full tariffs only because my cities have more political influence in national elections.

i agree i live in a 40 million country whit less energy consumption(argentina), to solve a volatility and dependency problem whit an asset which is more volatile and ASS controlled (china's bans bitcon and the buy, the jpm is bad then buy it, regulation from eu and other), and isn't anonymous, we have billion dollars companies focus on tracks bitcoin transactions, and regular stock wallets tracks u.

this is not an argument, this idea that non mainstream is better is harmful , you could and should use bsd over Linux for real argument like loving the idea of "monolithic os", the problem whit the Linux foundation (one or all), or the problem of abundance nesting in most of Linux but it inst about being mainstream, they still exist project whit difference approaches some less orthodox, or non corporation, i think Linux have more robust ecosystems, the thinks works out of the box is a and approach who let people let in the ecosystems like corporations, example if you don't want systemd make a distro(share it please) or use one of the already existing once LTS or rolling realizes approach.