iloktr

They call it Google's ebook reader, but did Google have anything to do with it other than providing the content?

> there is no reason for your mom to switch

That may not be such a bad thing. On top of that, unless they fix their privacy concerns, some people will always prefer Google+.

So, am I allowed to sue Netflix if I can't afford to be a subscriber? What if I only like a genre of movies that isn't available on Netflix? I understand the need to have subtitles and in an ideal world, everything would come with them, but this seems a bit too much.

> Or security on all of these websites really sucks

Most plausible hypothesis

You are correct that Wikipedia isn't like the others, which are giant constructions that took enormous effort. However, Wikipedia is more significant and important today than all of them put together. If we were to lose the other Heritage sites, tourists would miss out and there would be a large monetary impact. Losing Wikipedia would be far more disastrous.

However, there's no point in becoming a world heritage site. It's simply recognition.