illumiN8i
Re:Launch HN: Firezone (YC W22) – Zero-trust access platform built on ...
on Thursday August 08, 2024 @01:43PM (#41194226)
Sometimes yes. MASQUE just looks like normal TLS port 443 traffic so it's less likely to be prevented. Other issues we had were just bugs with the WARP wireguard implementation regarding how the tunnel is built in Windows. I imagine it works better on Linux or MacOS which is likely what the developers were running when they designed WARP.
Re:Launch HN: Firezone (YC W22) – Zero-trust access platform built on ...
on Thursday August 08, 2024 @11:34AM (#41192637)
As a WARP user that has experienced a lot of problems, I'm glad that Cloudflare is allowing WARP users to switch from wireguard to MASQUE. I'm hopeful this will solve a lot of our issues.
Re:Cloudflare incident on June 20, 2024
on Wednesday June 26, 2024 @01:37PM (#40802400)
Thanks for the detailed explanation. These outage blog posts are great marketing and the main reason I use cloudflare.
Re:Cloudflare's URL Scanner, new features, and the story of how we bui...
on Monday March 11, 2024 @11:29AM (#39669434)
This looks like a good alternative to urlscan.io I wish this would bypass cloudflare's own verification challenge for phishing sites hosted on cloudflare. A common issue I have with url scanners is I'm unable to get past the verification and the screenshot just shows the cloudflare page. So many phishing pages are using cloudflare now.