ichugwindex

Wouldn't that create a bad incentive to not report crime then? Seems like the right response is to have the police/CPS act properly than to try and hold Karen's accountable.

As a manager, I'm planning on reaching out and offering my sympathy, support and a letter of recommendation.

Had the recipient bought cryptocurrencies with the proceeds, I wonder how much harder that would be to claw back. Could they still come out on top if they sell the house they bought for a profit?

His greatest failure was actually his greatest success.

My guess is that this is a content moderation bill aimed at YouTube. Would it apply to a app or only websites?

Unfortunately the subway stations in my neighborhood in Queens run above ground.

Does Wikipedia no longer require you to cite any sources?

What a dramatic response to what amounted to a slap on the wrist for his flagrant disregard for the law. The man is smart enough to make millions breaking the law, he will be just fine after serving some time.

I think that proving sentience is much harder than simply demonstrating something imitating it. Giving the AI additional freedoms would be way more telling.

How would it behave if it could send messages without being prompted? Does it message you when its lonely? If it truly has feelings and is responding to them then it should be acting upon its desires and modifying its behavior to achieve what it wants .

Basically the ex-machina test.

Seems like this would be helpful for api owners, but also helpful for hackers looking for victims. Very cool though.

I started recommending their mobile browser to everyone I know, because of how well it blocks pop-ups on the phone.

Not when sleepy, drunk or distracted.

Not for gaming.

He know's about the [spice melange](https://youtu.be/pEQREIDUJ88)

It's because of those pesky tests. If they stopped testing, no one would have it.

This has been my experience as well. Actually the only ones who have ever commented on height in general were women.

Is it only copyright infringement while the information is supposed to be secret? Seems weird that once the movie or show airs, it wouldn't be copyright infringement anymore.

I had my heroin addicted friend explain it to me: they add it because when others hear about the overdose, they will think that it was someone who couldn't handle a potent dose of heroin, not that it was fentanyl. Effectively they go looking for the supposedly potent heroin, advertised by the overdose.

Conspiracy theorist logic: Its a long con. Hitler is just fine in South America, albeit missing his jaw and piece of his skull. Pieces of evidence intentionally left for misdirection.

Randomly? No, it was deliberately used to make this article clickbait. Its not that fascinating when a normal person gets scammed. She scammed us by telling us she's a expert when she's clearly not.

Imagine if drug cartels had their hands on this technology. Whack a mole on a whole new level.

"Levels of PM2.5 were measured before, during, and after 8 cannabis social-smoking sessions in one 20-m2 household living room"

Isn't the amount being smoked relevant? It seems to vaguely compare weed smoke to cigarette smoke without factoring in what normal usage looks like for each. How does this compare to burning incense? Seems like a poorly designed study.

The classic hardcoded password

It wasn't like they had the equipment and she was stealing it. She was deliberately ordering equipment and shipping it to another company for profit.

This split keyboard is pretty unique: https://www.angrymiao.com/am-hatsu/

Still easier than cancelling with your cable provider.

It makes for a bad user experience for the rider. The customer wants to know that they can certainly get a ride, not get rejected because their destination isn't profitable.

They have cameras on all of them. They could identify you can ban you. But I still agree, they should let in the san francisco shop lifters to smash these unholy screens.

This guy watches tv for the commercials.

How long have you been working for them?