hunterb123
Whether you are finding someone's email, or real name, or jet location, or home address, and then announce it, you are doxxing them.
It is just an automobile after all, and vehicles aren't citizens...
Cue fallback argument.
EDIT: added clarification to distinguish between Tweeting coordinates and Onstar services.
one thing is broadcasting personal information about a citizen, one is protecting a citizens right to object to actions by their government.
collecting public information is still doxxing. most doxxing involves only public information as it happens across the internet.
edit: a downvote is not a rebuttal, sorry, try again.
Nevermind we were depending on the Russians for space flights before Elon.
Please speculate about more people so I know what to think!
Jacquesm? Marxist? I can do that too.
Or can you not think for yourself?
It's funny seeing the civility break down in certain topics.
Emotion, speculation, and bias run wild.
Almost like a campaign...
Nevermind the actual pedos, noone demanding the client list to the island travelers.
Yes being able to dissent the government about laptops or lab leaks or not rely o the russians to launch satellites or shuttle us to the space station is important as well.
Emotions and hyperboles when it fits here it seems. Reason comes second, if ever.
Everyone is still just pissy here because their liberal bubble is burst on Twitter.
I love Mastodon, now that it was accepted here the last month or so, why is everyone not on it yet?
(hint: no, you are driving the car with assisted technology)
I'll remember to cite this in the next Tesla thread when we discuss Autopilot and self-driving.
I say that because it's not driving itself, it's driving a route you plotted or recorded.
You can't take that same tractor and have it work on your neighbors pasture as-is, it has to be programmed.
But again, this is getting into a semantics debate. Personally I'd prefer to differentiate using autonomous and automated, self-driving is too ambiguous.
To avoid a semantics debate, I'll agree for a brief moment the AI is "driving" the tractor to avoid an object and get back on the pre-programmed route.
AI and data collection is useful for more intricate tasks, like spraying weeds, planting seeds, etc.
You don't just "send a message" once, you fine hospitals not compliant, period. We do this for other regulations.
So at this rate maybe in 2040 most hospitals will post their prices, maybe. If everyone feels like following / enforcing the law.
Also, did you even read the guidelines?
> Please don't comment on whether someone read an article.
An IDE should have the text in the forefront, enable all the things an IDE normally does, as well as have a preview mode where you can visually edit.
A Dreamweaver for React.
In their defense it looks like they expect you to focus on the text part in your normal editor.
But at that point they should make this a VSCode extension or something.
Having your source being modified from two programs is... silly.
Hospitals are defying it and not posting prices with no repercussions.
Just because there's a lot of people in highly populated cells that drag down the speed for people in those cells has nothing to do with the speeds of the lowly populated cells.
tldr; it makes no sense to average all cells together, as the goal is to improve the areas where existing infrastructure have failed in specific regions.
(and in those areas, where hughesnet, or viasat, or old DSL were the few options, Starlink does it's best)
So if you take a cell that has LA in it, it will be much more congested than if you took a cell in Wyoming, or Nebraska.
Starlink shines when it comes to rural/remote environments, not cities where towers and fiber can reach.
Side note, look at HughesNet and Viasat in their data, LOL!
edit: instead of downvoting if someone could find the sampling method?
https://www.nytco.com/press/the-new-york-times-to-host-annua...
Brave also has a rewards program the user can opt-in to get scheduled text notifications on their system.
I could see your point somewhat if their rewards system was opt-out or tied to whether the adblocker was on, but it's not.
In that case you pay the $3 to remove them or don't use the service.
You say money grab, but in reality you need a way to pay for the system, nothing is free.
How would you support your search index without providing a subscription or ads?
This emotionalism is tiring. People here don't like Eich, it has nothing to do with Brave.
You may not know of a tree cutting service until you look there.
You may not know where to get a car part until you look there.
Having ads riddled throughout the internet is one thing, but having a directory where ads are supposed to be is another.
Yes billboards are annoying, that doesn't make classifieds equal.
(oh and you could just pay $3/mo or not use the service if you have no use for classifieds)
You stated your opinion, but you forgot to add your reasoning.
Just don't use Brave search, the separate product. Or you know, add the blocking rules yourself to the ad blocker, that works. Or you know, pay the $3 dollars to support the thing you use.
Most of the people complaining here don't actually care about this. This is all just a proxy war to go against Eich for his beliefs. It happens every Brave thread, pretty transparent and pathetic.
The Brave rewards are system OS text notifications that you can OPT IN to.
In no way do they replace banner ads on websites.