hitgeek
however the last 2 years I've experienced kids being taught to read in US public school kindergarten and the curriculum was nothing like was described in this series. They were taught phonics and memorized common non-phonetic words the same way I was taught 30 years ago.
facebook probably didn't do anything illegal, but many people feel they failed to sufficiently protect user data from bad actors.
It the absence of laws or regulations to punish facebook, the only recourse is for users to leave the platform. this probably won't happen b/c most people don't know or don't care. but if we think its in the public good to protect this data we should seek to pass some regulations that require platforms like facebook to meet an acceptable threshold of data protection.
given the effects that harvesting facebook data can have on elections, its probably a good idea for regulators to step in.
we had a hard time getting people interested in using it and signing up. and those who did sign up rarely used it after the first few weeks.
when talking to people, the primary reason seemed to be that they wanted to communicate with a person for most healthcare related needs b/c they had questions or wanted clarification/re-enforcement. They used the online portal so infrequently that they never felt confident they could quickly get what they needed accomplished.
The notable exception is parents managing the records of their children, which I don't think will be a feature of this v1 health records app.
its all about user experience though. i'm hopeful Apple can delivery something that is better than what is available and has come before.
i'm worried b/c I don't see it as a v1 and done feature. It will take consistent interaction and improvement as health record systems change and capabilities increase. hopefully apple is committed to it.
Most people do not want to manage their own health records, or only become interested for short periods of time after illness.
For those who do want this service, I'm hopeful Apple will improve user experience such that its easy but provides value.
EHR vendors do not make data sharing easy so having an even larger player in the space, pushing innovation, is welcomed.
genuine for me, is making changes that are good for people, even if they are bad for advertisers.
I thought the amount of trash posts and videos (which caused me to leave Facebook) had greatly declined, but wasn’t sure why. If it’s related to this change, it’s a good start.
While I’m skeptical of Facebook, I appreciate their attempt to improve if it’s genuine.
perhaps the features were used inappropriately, but I would hope Uber can remote wipe a laptop, log users out of company systems, or centrally enforce encryption policies.
this line is just silly.
--"Later versions of Ripley gave Uber the ability to selectively provide information to government agencies that searched the company’s foreign offices. At the direction of company lawyers, security engineers could select which information to share with officials who had warrants to access Uber’s systems, the people say"
What is the alternative? Giving law enforcement access to all data without any discretion? Querying ride data for 1 person is technically "selectively provide information", but that seems perfectly acceptable.
I couldn't figure out how to exit the full screen interactive code view.
The button to delete a todo and "check" a todo are pretty close together, easy to click the wrong one. maybe move the check to the left side of the text?
adding links is really slow.
there has been a few times since then that the machine will freeze then show a folder with question mark icon.
surprisingly it boots up fine after turning it off and on again, but I'm worried it won't last long.
its a bummer b/c even though the machine is old, I upgraded to 8gb of ram and 500gb ssd and the performance is comprisable to a new MacBook a just got.
when it was $200-$300 to upgrade with a contract renewal, I tended to get a new phone with every iteration, regardless of the new features or condition of my current phone.
Now that the latest phones are $700+, or $40+ per month with insurance, I evaluate the purchase in the same way I've always looked at new laptops/desktops. If the current model meets my needs and there are no new features I will get much value from, I have no interest in upgrading.
have others experience this shift?
the only new feature that has me interested in a the iPhone X is portrait mode in a smaller form factor.
if there was no evidence that any data was actually compromised, I'm not sure I see a reason why they would need to disclose this to the public.
"John Smith likes Wall Street Journal" with the headline and picture from a recent article.
It appears in your news feed like John Smith recently liked Wall Street Journal, or that article.
In reality they probably clicked the like button years ago, and Facebook just continuously recycles that in your news feed, in a way that appears recent.
$30 for a computer generated logo. $990 for a professionally designed logo.
I'm pretty sure you can get a computer generated logo for free from a variety of services, and professional logos for much less than $990.
The UX on the site isn't great, so I wouldn't really pay for a premium service.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/net-standar...
.Net Core is one implementation of the standard. .Net 4.6 is another implementation of the standard. Mono, Xamarin, Universal Windows Platforms are other implementations.
The idea is that any code written for .Net standard, will work across the different implementations.
I was all in on windows mobile around v7 and windows8. bought the flagship lumia phone and surface rt tablet. invested the time to develop some basic apps. 6 months later both platforms were basically discontinued with no upgrade path, so I abandoned it too.
if microsoft had just made an enterprise successor to blackberry, instead of trying to make a consumer phone, they probably would have been more successful. once the platform had traction in enterprise, maybe they could of made the consumer jump.
its very difficult to relay signs from the dugout to the batter in the few seconds between when the sign is given and when the pitch is thrown.
base runners on second base have always been able to see the signs between pitcher and catcher and relay the information to the batter. To counter this catchers use a complex combination of signs that change inning to inning, sometimes batter to batter.
I love the elegant simplicity of the home button.
this part of the original iphone launch is one of my favorites:
"And on the front, there’s only one button down there. We call it the home button. Takes you home from wherever you are."
I just signed up for a new account, and it seemed pretty snappy. I might give it a try again.
yes, viable is the hard part. just like "loveable" will be the hard part of SLC.
next month's article. "SLCs make me SC(sick)"
I just prefer node style callbacks, so I wrap libraries with promise based APIs with callback based wrappers.
hopefully i'm not the only one.
function getUserInfo(callback) { async.parallel([api.getUser, api.getFriends, api.getPhoto], callback) }
documentation is still confusing and contradictory, but a little less sparse.
I use the dotnet cli for everything, and rarely need to manually edit the csproj. Even when I do, the csproj is very simple straightforward xml, nothing like the old version.
I use node/npm/gulp tool chain for build pipelines. I set up npm wrappers for the dotnet cli, "npm run build", "npm run test", "npm run start", which I like.
my favorite thing is that I can reasonably work on c# projects without full Visual Studio and solutions.
whats the backstory for this library?
I really enjoyed the product, and never had an issue with quality.
for me cost was primary reason for cancelling. Buying ingredients saves me about $100 a month. Even with Blue Apron I had to go to the grocery store weekly for lunch and breakfast food, so it was a "nice to have luxury", not something that saved time or money.
I worry that Blue Apron is going to have a hard time making the economics of custom acquisition vs. life time value work if high churn is a permanent thing.