News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

hilariouswhip

Re:The C juggernaut illustrated (2012) on Saturday February 04, 2023 @07:07PM (#34659950)
> As far as I can tell, there isn't anyone on the face of the planet trying to build anything like C in order to replace it.

Yeah because it would be a bad idea.

Re:Critique of the mind/body problem: it's not solvable on Saturday February 04, 2023 @03:37PM (#34658003)
Woo is merely the output of 100+ fireside retellings of a theory by someone who tried to construct a metaphysical theory without the woo.
Re:Critique of the mind/body problem: it's not solvable on Saturday February 04, 2023 @03:34PM (#34657970)
Sort of a if-everything-can-happen-it-will-happen scenario. But not what I was talking about.
Re:Critique of the mind/body problem: it's not solvable on Saturday February 04, 2023 @03:33PM (#34657956)
Sure. But concurrent consciousness is too advanced for me to think about. All I know is serial consciousness.

There are all kinds of possibilities, but that barrier of Death is a clear cut-off from my perspective. What’s beyond that? I for sure could imagine annihilation, too. After all I can be knocked unconscious.

Re:Critique of the mind/body problem: it's not solvable on Saturday February 04, 2023 @03:30PM (#34657939)
This only says that consciousness is ever-mutating. Most would agree on that. But most would disagree on the death question: afterlife, another life, or annihilation.
Re:Critique of the mind/body problem: it's not solvable on Saturday February 04, 2023 @03:28PM (#34657913)
I didn’t mention the self or omniscience.
Re:Critique of the mind/body problem: it's not solvable on Saturday February 04, 2023 @03:22PM (#34657838)
I didn’t say that this was good or bad.

I think it’s bad and hope that the Fourth Noble Truth of Buddhism is true.

Re:Mental Illness: The Men Cry in the Dark (2022) on Saturday February 04, 2023 @09:23AM (#34654692)
Yeah. Like really, you can’t see eyes well up at dusk? Or hear sniffling?
Re:Mental Illness: The Men Cry in the Dark (2022) on Saturday February 04, 2023 @09:06AM (#34654576)
He didn’t even interpret the reason for it. Just that a woman may be disgusted.

You covered some reason for it on the woman’s part. While he (OP) seemed to only be talking about the man’s reason (motivation) to not act like that.

Re:Critique of the mind/body problem: it's not solvable on Friday February 03, 2023 @06:42PM (#34649476)
Yep, something like that!
Re:Critique of the mind/body problem: it's not solvable on Friday February 03, 2023 @06:12PM (#34649172)
The mind-body problem sounds too Cartesian. A dualism that is a bit too outdated.

I personally have a weird intuition considering my cultural background: it makes sense to me that my consciousness would be “born” somewhere else when I die. This in contrast to most people of my cultural background, who either believe in annihilism or an ever-lasting afterlife. I don’t really understand why a little more people don’t at least find it philosophically (what’s the word?) plausible, or something.

Re:The Curse of the Corporate Headshot on Friday February 03, 2023 @05:51PM (#34648943)
I didn’t intend to brag!: it was only a means to brag about my career success.
Re:Build your career on dirty work on Sunday September 11, 2022 @06:02PM (#32803711)
> Trotsky later claimed that Stalin amassed power as a bureaucratic mediocrity, but it was actually Yakov Sverdlov, assisted by Elena Stasova, who ran the Party machine. Stalin was not a born bureaucrat at all. He was a hard worker utterly dedicated to politics; indeed everything with Stalin was political, but he worked in an eccentric, structureless, unbureaucratic, almost bohemian, style that would not have succeeded in any other government, then or now. Lenin’s trust was won in the bank robberies and intrigues of the early years and, later, on the battlefields of the Civil War: Stalin was hardly in his office before 1920.

Young Stalin