hgielatan
https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inc...
It worked earlier today, IDK what to tell you.
And it's fine to criticize specific DEI implementations, and to look at the research and call out issues. But that's not what you're doing; you're saying that DEI as a whole is ineffective, which is objectively false.
The consequences of a felony charge make it so that clarity needs to be crystal, and as so many articles have already discussed, what's unclear is what books could result in that felony charge.
I didn't edit my comment to fix my links, what are you talking about?
And your company misimplementing DEI is not a reflection of DEI itself, just a reflection of how difficult it is to get these kinds of things right.
Can you back that claim up by actually citing... literally anything?
Can you prove Asians were included-then-excluded from the studies I've cited, as you're claiming?
> All of your links are either paywalled studies, or lead to 404 pages, except for the first one.
That's false.
> Right, so any diversity of ethnicity - including Asians - was associated with this "diversity boost".
Can you cite a specific reason a) why that matters or b) where it says what you're claiming specifically?
> And again, what was the criteria used to measure diversity? Did it count Asians as diverse? You keep citing excerpts from these studies, but don't include anything relevant to my comment: are Asians considered diverse or not?
Find it! You keep posing these questions, but refuse to do the work of arriving at the solution yourself, which you are entirely capable of doing. Go answer your own questions!
> And for the third time are Asians considered diverse? That's the crux of the question that you continuously fail to answer.
Why are you discriminating against Asians this blatantly and obviously? It's wild, how you think this is okay.