heaney-555
heaney-555 on Hacker News
Thunderf00t has been consistently and fantastically wrong about Falcon 9, Dragon, Starlink, Starship, Tesla Model 3, and Tesla FSD.
The word "any" has a specific meaning that isn't up for debate.
>The one that clearly showed that the stuff that should have been on the underside just.... wasn't?
That just isn't true. That conclusion is based on a single compressed screenshot from a low-quality compressed version of the livestream.
There are high-quality photographs taken by the people there that show its underside is entirely normal.
That's not even in question. If you read the article, Tesla already said it will refund the deposits, and give 1 year of FSD, worth AU$1788, to those who order a Model Y or Model 3.
bigfishrunning claimed that they "work without any AI".
It's not at all a moving of the goalposts to ask whether the "any" in that is actually true.
What illegal tactics do you believe they used?
It's not about the facts. It's about political posturing and emotional sophistry.
What law do you believe Meta broke?
And you have the Google AI Overview disabled too? Or you never read what it says about the docs you're looking for?
>we created this problem
No, the people who wrote the original code with security vulnerabilities created the problem, or those who architected their language/framework/SDK to not have easy forwards compatibility.
>we are releasing the dangerous stuff
No, they are disclosing its existence, not releasing it.
Yup. I think they literally think a 256-bit key is just a random number between 1 and 255.
I think it's worse than that. I think whoever did this genuinely thought that a "256-bit security key" meant a random number between 1 and 256.
Or Axios's source is simply mistaken.
This was what the person I replied to said:
>And we see how he votes, we see which parties he supports.
And that itself was a reply to my debunking of:
>Plus, he's one of the white supremacists of South Africa
------
So given that Musk has only ever voted in the United States, previously for the Democratic Party and now the Republican Party, how can this be interpreted any other way?
Are you suggesting that everyone who supports the US Republican Party is a white supremacist? Really?
>Musk is limiting StarLink capabilities to Ukraine
Incorrect. The US government limited Starshield, the military version of Starlink which it controls. SpaceX has no say.
Musk left South Africa at 17 years old. You cannot suggest that a child being born in a place means he was complicit in its political failings. He was never even old enough to cast a vote.
False. FSD Supervised is available in Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, Czech Republic, Croatia, Slovenia, Lithuania, and Estonia.
Tesla is also in the process of a deal with German regulators to get it approved by changing the name to TAD (Tesla Assisted Driving). And when Germany approves, the rest of Europe will likely quickly follow.
It's obviously both. Why does it have to be one or the other?
Musk is not a Nazi and does not decide how Starshield is used.
The person who made this decision will have been Trump.
Sure, but the $100 billion Meta has spent so far on "the Metaverse" is actually false reporting, because the majority of that has been spent on smart glasses.
So when discussing the spending efficiency, that matters.
You're conflating Gemini Flash with Gemini Pro.
Quest headsets are roughly as popular as Xbox and Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses have sold an order of magnitude more units than all other smart glasses combined.
But it's far far too early to draw any conclusions around that.
A lot of people have completely tuned out that kind of marketing now. We're in an era where the feeds are filled with so much BS that people don't know what to believe anymore.
>This is because a whole lot of questions don't have a single correct answer. Do we want to keep backwards compatibility? Do we care more about latency or throughput? How much memory can the system use under load? Is loosing new content notifications after a crash acceptable?
This hasn't been the case for months now. In Codex, if the model is having trouble understanding what you meant, it will ask you followup questions before going ahead.
I have personally encountered GPT-6 Astra ask these exact questions before proceeding!
Like most criticism of AI, this is woefully outdated.
When is the last time you used an AI chatbot, and do you only use the free versions?
>Your car is still the same.
Not for Tesla owners in select countries, where their car now drives them around 99% of the time, or the people of Austin Texas, that can now hail a fully driverless Cybercab for cheaper than an Uber!
>Food quality is worse.
Food quality is higher than ever if you want high-quality food!
Unfortunately, the people crave slop.
That's exactly what happened for several of these theorems.